ESLG vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ESLG (Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESLG charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

ESLG vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF (ESLG) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ESLG

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 7.79%
• YTD: 12.94%
• 6M: 12.12%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESLG vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ESLG Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF	2.61%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ESLG and GRW is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.80

Return for Risk

ESLG vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF (ESLG) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESLG	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	13.58	-12.38

Drawdowns

ESLG vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESLG drawdown since its inception was -12.36%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESLG and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESLG	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.36%	-0.45%	-11.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.07%	-0.27%	-0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.39%	-0.17%	-3.22%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ESLG	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.78%	8.89%	+6.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.78%	8.89%	+6.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.78%	8.89%	+6.89%

ESLG vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESLG has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESLG vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

ESLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ESLG Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF	0.15%	0.04%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESLG and GRW in my portfolio?

ESLG and GRW have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESLG or GRW?

On fees, ESLG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESLG or GRW?

ESLG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESLG or GRW?

ESLG has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between ESLG and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: Eventide and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ESLG and 0.75% for GRW.