ESK vs. XBCI

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ESK (REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF) and XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ESK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for XBCI.

Performance

ESK vs. XBCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF (ESK) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ESK

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

XBCI

• 1D: -3.22%
• 1M: 3.82%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	$3.48M	$3.42M	$5.46M

ESK vs. XBCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ESK REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF	-29.27%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	-22.94%

Correlation

The correlation between ESK and XBCI is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026	0.80

Return for Risk

ESK vs. XBCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF (ESK) and NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ESK	XBCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-37.31%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-30.97%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-15.82%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ESK	XBCI	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	62.61%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	62.61%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	62.61%	—

ESK vs. XBCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XBCI's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESK vs. XBCI - Dividend Comparison

ESK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than XBCI's 26.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ESK REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF	1.06%	0.30%
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF	26.04%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESK and XBCI in my portfolio?

ESK and XBCI have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESK or XBCI?

On fees, ESK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESK or XBCI?

ESK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESK or XBCI?

XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 26.04%, compared with 1.06% for ESK.

What is the main difference between ESK and XBCI?

They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ESK and 0.98% for XBCI.