ESK vs. EZPZ
ESK (REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF) and EZPZ (Franklin Crypto Index ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. ESK is actively managed, while EZPZ is passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ESK charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZPZ.
Performance
ESK vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESK achieves a -39.23% return, which is significantly lower than EZPZ's -28.21% return.
ESK
- 1D
- -6.26%
- 1M
- -24.17%
- YTD
- -39.23%
- 6M
- -42.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZPZ
- 1D
- -3.03%
- 1M
- -18.55%
- YTD
- -28.21%
- 6M
- -33.71%
- 1Y
- -39.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESK vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESK REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF | -39.23% | -23.15% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | -28.21% | -21.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESK and EZPZ is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESK vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank
ESK
EZPZ
ESK vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF (ESK) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESK | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.99 | -0.61 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
ESK vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESK drawdown since its inception was -61.14%, which is greater than EZPZ's maximum drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESK and EZPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESK | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.14% | -52.38% | -8.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.14% | -51.59% | -9.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.19% | -21.72% | -18.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.44% | — |
Volatility
ESK vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESK | EZPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 36.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.24% | 46.83% | +20.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.24% | 47.65% | +19.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.24% | 47.65% | +19.59% |
ESK vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESK has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESK vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison
ESK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, while EZPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ESK REX-Osprey ETH + Staking ETF | 0.97% | 0.30% |
EZPZ Franklin Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, ESK and EZPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ESK.
ESK has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for EZPZ.
They also come from different issuers: REX Shares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ESK and 0.19% for EZPZ.
Find the right allocation for ESK and EZPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer