ESJS.L vs. UYM

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

ESJS.L (Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) and UYM (ProShares Ultra Basic Materials) are both exchange-traded funds - ESJS.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while UYM is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESJS.L returned 9.73%/yr vs 6.73%/yr for UYM. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESJS.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UYM.

Performance

ESJS.L vs. UYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESJS.L) and ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ESJS.L is traded in GBp, while UYM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UYM values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESJS.L achieves a 14.30% return, which is significantly lower than UYM's 19.75% return.

ESJS.L

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: -3.72%
• 6M: 7.59%
• YTD: 14.30%
• 1Y: 32.76%
• 3Y*: 16.70%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: —

UYM

• 1D: -1.33%
• 1M: -6.80%
• 6M: 3.79%
• YTD: 19.75%
• 1Y: 19.26%
• 3Y*: 5.76%
• 5Y*: 6.73%
• 10Y*: 10.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESJS.L vs. UYM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ESJS.L Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc	14.30%	18.47%	9.64%	12.97%	-7.90%	-27.12%
UYM ProShares Ultra Basic Materials	19.75%	1.66%	-6.39%	11.60%	-13.96%	35.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ESJS.L and UYM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2021	0.31

ESJS.L vs. UYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESJS.L	UYM
Technology	25.5%	-
Industrials	23.2%	1.1%
Financial Services	18.6%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	12.7%
Communication Services	9.1%	-
Healthcare	6.0%	-
Basic Materials	2.5%	87.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	-
Real Estate	1.8%	-
Energy	0.7%	-
Utilities	0.4%	-

Return for Risk

ESJS.L vs. UYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESJS.L

ESJS.L Risk / Return Rank: 74
ESJS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ESJS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ESJS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ESJS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ESJS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 72

UYM

UYM Risk / Return Rank: 22
UYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
UYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
UYM Omega Ratio Rank: 21
UYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
UYM Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESJS.L vs. UYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESJS.L) and ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESJS.L	UYM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	0.58	+1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	1.01	+1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.12	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	0.87	+2.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.71	2.29	+7.42

ESJS.L vs. UYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESJS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the UYM Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESJS.L and UYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ESJS.L vs. UYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESJS.L drawdown since its inception was -37.23%, smaller than the maximum UYM drawdown of -89.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESJS.L and UYM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESJS.L	UYM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.23%	-89.92%	+52.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.62%	-22.23%	+11.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.59%	-42.65%	+28.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.38%	-42.65%	+23.27%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.10%	-12.26%	+6.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.66%	-33.54%	+11.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.52%	8.43%	-4.91%

Volatility

ESJS.L vs. UYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESJS.L) is 6.75%, while ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) has a volatility of 10.06%. This indicates that ESJS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESJS.L	UYM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.75%	10.06%	-3.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.89%	26.37%	-10.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.35%	33.48%	-14.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.27%	36.57%	-20.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.00%	40.95%	-20.95%

ESJS.L vs. UYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESJS.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than UYM's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESJS.L vs. UYM - Dividend Comparison

ESJS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ESJS.L Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UYM ProShares Ultra Basic Materials	1.18%	1.47%	0.98%	0.28%	0.88%	0.52%	0.56%	1.24%	0.94%	0.38%	0.55%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESJS.L and UYM in my portfolio?

ESJS.L and UYM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESJS.L or UYM?

On fees, ESJS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESJS.L or UYM?

ESJS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UYM.

What is the main difference between ESJS.L and UYM?

ESJS.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while UYM is Leveraged Equities. ESJS.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while UYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ESJS.L and 0.95% for UYM.