PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESJS.L vs. DXJA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESJS.L vs. DXJA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESJS.L) and WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (DXJA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESJS.L is traded in GBp, while DXJA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DXJA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESJS.L achieves a 14.30% return, which is significantly lower than DXJA.L's 20.35% return.


ESJS.L

1D
-0.97%
1M
-3.72%
6M
7.59%
YTD
14.30%
1Y
32.76%
3Y*
16.70%
5Y*
9.73%
10Y*

DXJA.L

1D
-2.18%
1M
-3.76%
6M
10.50%
YTD
20.35%
1Y
50.56%
3Y*
29.77%
5Y*
27.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESJS.L vs. DXJA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESJS.L
Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc
14.30%18.47%9.64%12.97%-7.90%-27.12%
DXJA.L
WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc
20.35%23.95%31.19%34.18%18.87%15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ESJS.L and DXJA.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2021

0.74

The correlation between ESJS.L and DXJA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (5 years) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESJS.L vs. DXJA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESJS.L
DXJA.L

Technology

25.5%
14.4%

Industrials

23.2%
27.5%

Financial Services

18.6%
19.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
16.7%

Communication Services

9.1%
3.8%

Healthcare

6.0%
6.7%

Basic Materials

2.5%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.0%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Energy

0.7%
1.7%

Utilities

0.4%

-

Technology

ESJS.L
25.5%
DXJA.L
14.4%

Industrials

ESJS.L
23.2%
DXJA.L
27.5%

Financial Services

ESJS.L
18.6%
DXJA.L
19.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ESJS.L
10.2%
DXJA.L
16.7%

Communication Services

ESJS.L
9.1%
DXJA.L
3.8%

Healthcare

ESJS.L
6.0%
DXJA.L
6.7%

Basic Materials

ESJS.L
2.5%
DXJA.L
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

ESJS.L
2.0%
DXJA.L
2.6%

Real Estate

ESJS.L
1.8%
DXJA.L

-

Energy

ESJS.L
0.7%
DXJA.L
1.7%

Utilities

ESJS.L
0.4%
DXJA.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESJS.L vs. DXJA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESJS.L
ESJS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ESJS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESJS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESJS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ESJS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESJS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

DXJA.L
DXJA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DXJA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXJA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXJA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DXJA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXJA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESJS.L vs. DXJA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESJS.L) and WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (DXJA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESJS.LDXJA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.43

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

5.49

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

17.26

-7.55

ESJS.L vs. DXJA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESJS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the DXJA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESJS.L and DXJA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESJS.L vs. DXJA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESJS.L drawdown since its inception was -37.23%, which is greater than DXJA.L's maximum drawdown of -31.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESJS.L and DXJA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESJS.LDXJA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.23%

-31.73%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.62%

-9.16%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.59%

-22.58%

+7.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.38%

-22.58%

+3.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.10%

-5.49%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.66%

-5.69%

-15.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.52%

2.92%

+0.60%

Volatility

ESJS.L vs. DXJA.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESJS.L) has a higher volatility of 6.75% compared to WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (DXJA.L) at 5.94%. This indicates that ESJS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXJA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESJS.LDXJA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.75%

5.94%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.89%

16.41%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.35%

20.51%

-1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.27%

20.02%

-3.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.00%

20.14%

-0.14%

ESJS.L vs. DXJA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESJS.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DXJA.L's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESJS.L vs. DXJA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESJS.L nor DXJA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ESJS.L and DXJA.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESJS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESJS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DXJA.L.

ESJS.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while DXJA.L tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ESJS.L and 0.48% for DXJA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESJS.L and DXJA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer