PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESIX vs. ROSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESIX vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIX achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly lower than ROSC's 11.71% return.


ESIX

1D
-1.16%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
10.83%
6M
9.86%
1Y
22.21%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
10Y*

ROSC

1D
-0.88%
1M
0.50%
YTD
11.71%
6M
12.39%
1Y
30.49%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
10.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIX vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ESIX
SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF
10.83%1.83%9.66%17.51%-14.62%
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
11.71%10.18%7.28%18.88%-9.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIX and ROSC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2022

0.96

The correlation between ESIX and ROSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESIX vs. ROSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESIX
ROSC

Industrials

17.2%
11.2%

Financial Services

17.0%
18.7%

Technology

16.6%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
14.1%

Healthcare

10.8%
20.1%

Real Estate

6.9%
5.5%

Energy

6.7%
3.8%

Basic Materials

4.4%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
6.6%

Communication Services

2.9%
3.6%

Utilities

2.0%
1.9%

Industrials

ESIX
17.2%
ROSC
11.2%

Financial Services

ESIX
17.0%
ROSC
18.7%

Technology

ESIX
16.6%
ROSC
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ESIX
12.4%
ROSC
14.1%

Healthcare

ESIX
10.8%
ROSC
20.1%

Real Estate

ESIX
6.9%
ROSC
5.5%

Energy

ESIX
6.7%
ROSC
3.8%

Basic Materials

ESIX
4.4%
ROSC
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

ESIX
3.0%
ROSC
6.6%

Communication Services

ESIX
2.9%
ROSC
3.6%

Utilities

ESIX
2.0%
ROSC
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESIX vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIX
ESIX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ESIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ROSC
ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIX vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESIXROSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.35

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

3.95

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.57

12.81

-6.24

ESIX vs. ROSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the ROSC Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIX and ROSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESIXROSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

1.97

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.46

-0.22

Drawdowns

ESIX vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIX drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum ROSC drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIX and ROSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESIXROSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.56%

-43.13%

+15.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.18%

-7.75%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.56%

-23.74%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-1.76%

-0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.59%

-7.21%

-1.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

2.39%

+0.83%

Volatility

ESIX vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) at 3.54%. This indicates that ESIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESIXROSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

3.54%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.40%

10.30%

+2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.99%

15.56%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.53%

19.32%

+2.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.53%

20.28%

+1.25%

ESIX vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESIX vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison

ESIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than ROSC's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESIX
SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF
1.45%1.64%1.65%1.69%1.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.87%2.08%2.00%2.01%1.51%2.13%1.75%3.05%2.86%2.13%2.20%2.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ESIX and ROSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ESIX has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to ROSC (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESIX dropped -27.56% vs ROSC's -43.13%.

On 3-year performance, ROSC leads with 15.86% vs 14.39% for ESIX. On fees, ESIX is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, ROSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ROSC has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 14.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESIX is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ROSC.

ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.45% for ESIX.

ESIX tracks S&P SmallCap 600 ESG Index, while ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ESIX and 0.34% for ROSC.

ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESIX and ROSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer