ESIX vs. ROSC
ESIX (SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF) and ROSC (Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - ESIX tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 ESG Index while ROSC tracks the ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESIX returned 14.39%/yr vs 15.86%/yr for ROSC. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ESIX charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for ROSC.
Performance
ESIX vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIX achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly lower than ROSC's 11.71% return.
ESIX
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 22.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROSC
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 11.71%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 30.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.05%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
ESIX vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIX SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF | 10.83% | 1.83% | 9.66% | 17.51% | -14.62% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 11.71% | 10.18% | 7.28% | 18.88% | -9.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIX and ROSC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2022 | 0.96 |
The correlation between ESIX and ROSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESIX vs. ROSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESIX
ROSC
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
ESIX
ROSC
Financial Services
ESIX
ROSC
Technology
ESIX
ROSC
Consumer Cyclical
ESIX
ROSC
Healthcare
ESIX
ROSC
Real Estate
ESIX
ROSC
Energy
ESIX
ROSC
Basic Materials
ESIX
ROSC
Consumer Defensive
ESIX
ROSC
Communication Services
ESIX
ROSC
Utilities
ESIX
ROSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIX vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank
ESIX
ROSC
ESIX vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESIX | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.35 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 3.95 | -1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.57 | 12.81 | -6.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESIX | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 1.97 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.46 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
ESIX vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIX drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, smaller than the maximum ROSC drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIX and ROSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIX | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.56% | -43.13% | +15.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.18% | -7.75% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.56% | -23.74% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -1.76% | -0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.59% | -7.21% | -1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 2.39% | +0.83% |
Volatility
ESIX vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) at 3.54%. This indicates that ESIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIX | ROSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 3.54% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | 10.30% | +2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.99% | 15.56% | +2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 19.32% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 20.28% | +1.25% |
ESIX vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESIX vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison
ESIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than ROSC's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIX SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF | 1.45% | 1.64% | 1.65% | 1.69% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROSC Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.87% | 2.08% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.51% | 2.13% | 1.75% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 2.13% | 2.20% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, ESIX and ROSC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ESIX has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to ROSC (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESIX dropped -27.56% vs ROSC's -43.13%.
On 3-year performance, ROSC leads with 15.86% vs 14.39% for ESIX. On fees, ESIX is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, ROSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ROSC has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 14.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESIX is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ROSC.
ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.45% for ESIX.
ESIX tracks S&P SmallCap 600 ESG Index, while ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ESIX and 0.34% for ROSC.
ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESIX and ROSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer