ESIX vs. RB
ESIX (SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF) and RB (ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESIX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 ESG Index, while RB is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Russell 2000. Both are passively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESIX charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for RB.
Performance
ESIX vs. RB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIX achieves a 10.83% return, which is significantly higher than RB's 6.76% return.
ESIX
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 22.21%
- 3Y*
- 14.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 6.76%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESIX vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ESIX SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF | 10.83% | 7.94% |
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 6.76% | 10.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIX and RB is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIX vs. RB — Risk / Return Rank
ESIX
RB
ESIX vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF (ESIX) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESIX | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.57 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESIX | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 3.15 | -2.91 |
Drawdowns
ESIX vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIX drawdown since its inception was -27.56%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIX and RB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIX | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.56% | -1.70% | -25.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.42% | -0.47% | -1.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.59% | -0.41% | -8.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | — | — |
Volatility
ESIX vs. RB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIX | RB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.99% | 6.21% | +11.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 6.21% | +15.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 6.21% | +15.32% |
ESIX vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESIX vs. RB - Dividend Comparison
ESIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than RB's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIX SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF | 1.45% | 1.64% | 1.65% | 1.69% | 1.54% |
RB ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF | 2.00% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIX and RB have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESIX is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESIX is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for RB.
RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.45% for ESIX.
ESIX is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RB is Defined Outcome. ESIX tracks S&P SmallCap 600 ESG Index, while RB tracks Russell 2000. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for ESIX and 0.58% for RB.
Find the right allocation for ESIX and RB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer