ESIS.L vs. SIVR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ESIS.L (iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and SIVR (abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESIS.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while SIVR is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESIS.L returned 0.80%/yr vs 22.59%/yr for SIVR. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESIS.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SIVR.

Performance

ESIS.L vs. SIVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIS.L) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ESIS.L is traded in GBP, while SIVR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SIVR values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIS.L achieves a -2.90% return, which is significantly lower than SIVR's 4.47% return.

ESIS.L

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -0.85%
• YTD: -2.90%
• 6M: -2.91%
• 1Y: -2.62%
• 3Y*: -0.37%
• 5Y*: 0.80%
• 10Y*: —

SIVR

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 2.53%
• YTD: 4.47%
• 6M: 28.55%
• 1Y: 116.32%
• 3Y*: 42.36%
• 5Y*: 22.59%
• 10Y*: 16.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIS.L vs. SIVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ESIS.L iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	-2.90%	12.15%	-6.75%	-1.03%	-2.95%	12.22%	2.78%
SIVR abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF	4.47%	127.86%	23.20%	-5.87%	14.79%	-11.50%	9.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIS.L and SIVR is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.06
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020	0.01

Return for Risk

ESIS.L vs. SIVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESIS.L

ESIS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7
ESIS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
ESIS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
ESIS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7
ESIS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
ESIS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7

SIVR

SIVR Risk / Return Rank: 51
SIVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SIVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
SIVR Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SIVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
SIVR Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIS.L vs. SIVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIS.L) and abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESIS.L	SIVR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.19	2.05	-2.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.18	2.18	-2.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.37	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.19	2.90	-3.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.43	6.23	-6.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESIS.L vs. SIVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIS.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the SIVR Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIS.L and SIVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESIS.L	SIVR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19	2.05	-2.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	0.67	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.38	-0.21

Drawdowns

ESIS.L vs. SIVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIS.L drawdown since its inception was -17.71%, smaller than the maximum SIVR drawdown of -69.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIS.L and SIVR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESIS.L	SIVR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.71%	-69.37%	+51.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.78%	-40.36%	+26.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.78%	-40.36%	+26.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.71%	-40.36%	+22.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.36%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.86%	-34.69%	+21.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.44%	-39.98%	+32.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.04%	18.74%	-12.70%

Volatility

ESIS.L vs. SIVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (ESIS.L) is 4.54%, while abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) has a volatility of 15.40%. This indicates that ESIS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESIS.L	SIVR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	15.40%	-10.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.16%	56.33%	-45.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.58%	57.14%	-43.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.66%	33.96%	-21.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.67%	30.49%	-17.82%

ESIS.L vs. SIVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIS.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SIVR's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESIS.L vs. SIVR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESIS.L nor SIVR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESIS.L and SIVR in my portfolio?

ESIS.L and SIVR have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESIS.L or SIVR?

On fees, ESIS.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESIS.L or SIVR?

ESIS.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SIVR.

What is the main difference between ESIS.L and SIVR?

ESIS.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SIVR is Silver. ESIS.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while SIVR tracks LBMA Silver Price ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: iShares and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIS.L and 0.30% for SIVR.