ESIH.L vs. VJPA.DE
ESIH.L (iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF) and VJPA.DE (Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - ESIH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while VJPA.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the FTSE Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESIH.L returned 5.89%/yr vs 10.11%/yr for VJPA.DE. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESIH.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VJPA.DE.
Performance
ESIH.L vs. VJPA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ESIH.L is traded in GBP, while VJPA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VJPA.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIH.L achieves a -2.72% return, which is significantly lower than VJPA.DE's 15.69% return.
ESIH.L
- 1D
- 3.06%
- 1M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- -2.72%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 8.89%
- 3Y*
- 2.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- —
VJPA.DE
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 6.34%
- YTD
- 15.69%
- 6M
- 15.72%
- 1Y
- 34.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.69%
- 5Y*
- 10.11%
- 10Y*
- —
ESIH.L vs. VJPA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESIH.L iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF | -2.72% | 12.76% | -0.46% | 5.44% | 1.56% | 18.12% |
VJPA.DE Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating | 15.69% | 19.17% | 8.13% | 13.55% | -6.79% | -0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESIH.L and VJPA.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2021 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESIH.L vs. VJPA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ESIH.L
VJPA.DE
ESIH.L vs. VJPA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) and Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESIH.L | VJPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.36 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | 3.19 | -2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.54 | 10.57 | -9.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESIH.L | VJPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 1.90 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.64 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.59 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
ESIH.L vs. VJPA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIH.L drawdown since its inception was -24.44%, which is greater than VJPA.DE's maximum drawdown of -18.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIH.L and VJPA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESIH.L | VJPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.44% | -18.57% | -5.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.81% | -10.65% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.44% | -14.14% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.44% | -18.57% | -5.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.94% | -0.10% | -10.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -5.75% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.77% | 3.22% | +2.55% |
Volatility
ESIH.L vs. VJPA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to Vanguard FTSE Japan UCITS ETF Accumulating (VJPA.DE) at 3.33%. This indicates that ESIH.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VJPA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESIH.L | VJPA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 3.33% | +2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.21% | 14.51% | -2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.83% | 17.87% | -1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 15.55% | -0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.36% | 15.59% | -0.23% |
ESIH.L vs. VJPA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIH.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VJPA.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESIH.L vs. VJPA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESIH.L nor VJPA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESIH.L and VJPA.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VJPA.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VJPA.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIH.L.
ESIH.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VJPA.DE is Japan Equities. ESIH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while VJPA.DE tracks FTSE Japan. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIH.L and 0.15% for VJPA.DE.
Find the right allocation for ESIH.L and VJPA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer