PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ESIH.L vs. VA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ESIH.L vs. VA.TO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

ESIH.L (iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF) and VA.TO (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESIH.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while VA.TO is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESIH.L returned 5.35%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for VA.TO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESIH.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for VA.TO.

Performance

ESIH.L vs. VA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESIH.L is traded in GBP, while VA.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the VA.TO values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESIH.L achieves a -0.97% return, which is significantly lower than VA.TO's 27.20% return.

ESIH.L

1D
0.82%
1M
1.49%
YTD
-0.97%
6M
0.00%
1Y
8.13%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
—

VA.TO

1D
0.24%
1M
2.04%
YTD
27.20%
6M
27.79%
1Y
50.73%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
11.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESIH.L vs. VA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ESIH.L
iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF		-0.97%12.77%-0.54%5.46%1.56%17.09%-10.87%
VA.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF		27.20%22.70%3.48%9.15%-4.52%1.90%3.78%

Correlation

The correlation between ESIH.L and VA.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2020

0.25

ESIH.L vs. VA.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ESIH.L
VA.TO

Healthcare

100.0%
5.0%

Basic Materials

-

7.2%

Communication Services

-

4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.5%

Energy

-

1.6%

Financial Services

-

19.4%

Industrials

-

20.6%

Real Estate

-

4.3%

Technology

-

22.4%

Utilities

-

1.6%

Healthcare

ESIH.L
100.0%
VA.TO
5.0%

Basic Materials

ESIH.L

-

VA.TO
7.2%

Communication Services

ESIH.L

-

VA.TO
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ESIH.L

-

VA.TO
9.7%

Consumer Defensive

ESIH.L

-

VA.TO
3.5%

Energy

ESIH.L

-

VA.TO
1.6%

Financial Services

ESIH.L

-

VA.TO
19.4%

Industrials

ESIH.L

-

VA.TO
20.6%

Real Estate

ESIH.L

-

VA.TO
4.3%

Technology

ESIH.L

-

VA.TO
22.4%

Utilities

ESIH.L

-

VA.TO
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF

Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF

Often compared with ESIH.L:
ESIH.L vs. DRDR.LESIH.L vs. INRG.LESIH.L vs. XSHC.LESIH.L vs. HLTH.LESIH.L vs. VOOESIH.L vs. IITU.LESIH.L vs. ESIH.DE
Often compared with VA.TO:
VA.TO vs. VE.TOVA.TO vs. VPLVA.TO vs. XEF.TOVA.TO vs. XEQT.TOVA.TO vs. VIDY.TOVA.TO vs. VFV.TOVA.TO vs. SPWO

Return for Risk

ESIH.L vs. VA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ESIH.L
ESIH.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ESIH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
VA.TO
VA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
VA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESIH.L vs. VA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ESIH.LVA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.41
2.57

-2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.72
3.24

-2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.47

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.51

4.38

-3.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.20

16.25

-15.05

ESIH.L vs. VA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESIH.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the VA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESIH.L and VA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESIH.L vs. VA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESIH.L drawdown since its inception was -24.47%, roughly equal to the maximum VA.TO drawdown of -25.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIH.L and VA.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ESIH.LVA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.47%

-25.49%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.78%

-11.55%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.47%

-14.14%

-10.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.47%

-16.48%

-7.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-25.49%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.33%

-3.01%

-6.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-5.16%

-2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

3.10%

+2.65%

Volatility

ESIH.L vs. VA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) is 5.29%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF (VA.TO) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that ESIH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ESIH.LVA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

9.13%

-3.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

17.08%

-4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.83%

19.69%

-2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

16.02%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

17.38%

+0.53%

ESIH.L vs. VA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESIH.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than VA.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ESIH.L vs. VA.TO - Dividend Comparison

ESIH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESIH.L
iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VA.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index ETF		1.68%2.17%2.31%2.57%3.10%2.35%2.14%2.55%2.89%1.71%1.63%1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

ESIH.L and VA.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESIH.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIH.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VA.TO.

ESIH.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VA.TO is Asia Pacific Equities. ESIH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while VA.TO tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for ESIH.L and 0.22% for VA.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESIH.L and VA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer