PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGV vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGV vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGV achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 11.79% return.


ESGV

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.37%
6M
14.11%
YTD
13.17%
1Y
23.68%
3Y*
21.23%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.79%

QUS

1D
0.02%
1M
2.61%
6M
9.40%
YTD
11.79%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*
13.70%
ALL TIME*
12.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.81M$22.30M$25.78M
$3.07M$4.72M$3.42M

ESGV vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
13.17%16.48%24.69%30.79%-24.04%26.55%25.69%33.36%-14.45%
QUS
State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
11.79%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.72%12.40%32.45%-11.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGV and QUS is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018

0.93

The correlation between ESGV and QUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESGV vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGV
QUS

Technology

43.1%
28.4%

Financial Services

11.9%
15.7%

Communication Services

11.2%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
5.7%

Healthcare

10.1%
14.4%

Industrials

4.2%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
8.3%

Real Estate

2.6%
1.6%

Basic Materials

2.0%
2.2%

Utilities

0.1%
3.9%

Energy

0.0%
3.3%

Technology

ESGV
43.1%
QUS
28.4%

Financial Services

ESGV
11.9%
QUS
15.7%

Communication Services

ESGV
11.2%
QUS
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGV
11.2%
QUS
5.7%

Healthcare

ESGV
10.1%
QUS
14.4%

Industrials

ESGV
4.2%
QUS
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

ESGV
3.7%
QUS
8.3%

Real Estate

ESGV
2.6%
QUS
1.6%

Basic Materials

ESGV
2.0%
QUS
2.2%

Utilities

ESGV
0.1%
QUS
3.9%

Energy

ESGV
0.0%
QUS
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGV vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESGV
ESGV Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ESGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGV Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESGV vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGVQUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.41

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

3.04

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.27

13.56

-5.30

ESGV vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGV Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGV and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGV vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGV drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, roughly equal to the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGV and QUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGVQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.66%

-33.78%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-6.85%

-4.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.41%

-13.94%

-6.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.81%

-22.30%

-6.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

0.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.33%

-3.66%

-2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

1.53%

+1.34%

Volatility

ESGV vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 2.76%. This indicates that ESGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGVQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

2.76%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

7.06%

+4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.53%

9.21%

+5.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.55%

14.33%

+4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.52%

16.40%

+4.12%

ESGV vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESGV vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

ESGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than QUS's 1.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGV
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF
0.85%0.91%1.04%1.16%1.42%0.95%1.11%1.27%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUS
State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.25%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGV and QUS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESGV has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to QUS (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGV dropped -33.66% vs QUS's -33.78%.

On 5-year performance, ESGV leads with 11.80% vs 11.08% for QUS. On fees, ESGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGV has performed better with a 11.80% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUS.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.85% for ESGV.

ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ESGV and 0.15% for QUS.

QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGV and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer