ESGV vs. QUS
ESGV (Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF) and QUS (State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ESGV tracks the FTSE US All Cap Choice Index while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGV returned 11.80%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for QUS. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ESGV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
ESGV vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGV achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 11.79% return.
ESGV
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 14.11%
- YTD
- 13.17%
- 1Y
- 23.68%
- 3Y*
- 21.23%
- 5Y*
- 11.80%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.79%
QUS
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- 6M
- 9.40%
- YTD
- 11.79%
- 1Y
- 20.72%
- 3Y*
- 17.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.81M | $22.30M | $25.78M | |
| $3.07M | $4.72M | $3.42M |
ESGV vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGV Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF | 13.17% | 16.48% | 24.69% | 30.79% | -24.04% | 26.55% | 25.69% | 33.36% | -14.45% |
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 11.79% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -14.15% | 26.72% | 12.40% | 32.45% | -11.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGV and QUS is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2018 | 0.93 |
The correlation between ESGV and QUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESGV vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGV
QUS
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
ESGV
QUS
Financial Services
ESGV
QUS
Communication Services
ESGV
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
ESGV
QUS
Healthcare
ESGV
QUS
Industrials
ESGV
QUS
Consumer Defensive
ESGV
QUS
Real Estate
ESGV
QUS
Basic Materials
ESGV
QUS
Utilities
ESGV
QUS
Energy
ESGV
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGV vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
ESGV
QUS
ESGV vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGV | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.41 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 3.04 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.27 | 13.56 | -5.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGV vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGV drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, roughly equal to the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGV and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGV | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.66% | -33.78% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.60% | -6.85% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.41% | -13.94% | -6.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.81% | -22.30% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | 0.00% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -3.66% | -2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 1.53% | +1.34% |
Volatility
ESGV vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) has a higher volatility of 4.61% compared to State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 2.76%. This indicates that ESGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGV | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 2.76% | +1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | 7.06% | +4.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.53% | 9.21% | +5.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 14.33% | +4.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.52% | 16.40% | +4.12% |
ESGV vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESGV vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
ESGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than QUS's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGV Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF | 0.85% | 0.91% | 1.04% | 1.16% | 1.42% | 0.95% | 1.11% | 1.27% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUS State Street SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.25% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGV and QUS have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESGV has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to QUS (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGV dropped -33.66% vs QUS's -33.78%.
On 5-year performance, ESGV leads with 11.80% vs 11.08% for QUS. On fees, ESGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ESGV has performed better with a 11.80% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUS.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 0.85% for ESGV.
ESGV tracks FTSE US All Cap Choice Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ESGV and 0.15% for QUS.
QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGV and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer