ESGV vs. BUFH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ESGV (Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the FTSE US All Cap Choice Index, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESGV charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.

Performance

ESGV vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGV achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.

ESGV

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 6.08%
• YTD: 10.74%
• 6M: 10.73%
• 1Y: 28.04%
• 3Y*: 22.27%
• 5Y*: 12.64%
• 10Y*: —

BUFH

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 2.45%
• 6M: 2.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGV vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ESGV Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF	10.74%	13.03%
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	2.45%	3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGV and BUFH is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.74

Return for Risk

ESGV vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGV

ESGV Risk / Return Rank: 58
ESGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
ESGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ESGV Omega Ratio Rank: 61
ESGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
ESGV Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGV vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF (ESGV) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESGV	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.42	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESGV	BUFH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	2.91	-2.19

Drawdowns

ESGV vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGV drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGV and BUFH.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESGV	BUFH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.66%	-1.53%	-32.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.88%	-0.05%	-0.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.43%	-0.18%	-6.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.70%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ESGV	BUFH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.18%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.35%	2.37%	+10.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.35%	2.37%	+15.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.58%	2.37%	+18.21%

ESGV vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGV has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESGV vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison

ESGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ESGV Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF	0.85%	0.91%	1.04%	1.16%	1.42%	0.95%	1.11%	1.27%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESGV and BUFH in my portfolio?

ESGV and BUFH have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESGV or BUFH?

On fees, ESGV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESGV or BUFH?

ESGV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESGV or BUFH?

ESGV has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.

What is the main difference between ESGV and BUFH?

ESGV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ESGV and 0.95% for BUFH.