PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGU vs. RBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGU vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGU achieves a 8.38% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.32% return.


ESGU

1D
-1.34%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
8.38%
6M
7.35%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*

RBIL

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
2.32%
6M
2.37%
1Y
4.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGU vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ESGU and RBIL is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGU vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGU
ESGU Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
ESGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGU Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGU Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

RBIL
RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGU vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGURBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

2.13

-0.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

7.82

-5.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.27

42.95

-31.68

ESGU vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGU Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGU and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGU vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGU drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGU and RBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGURBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.87%

-0.52%

-33.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.26%

-0.52%

-8.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.19%

-0.50%

-2.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-0.07%

-4.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

0.10%

+2.01%

Volatility

ESGU vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that ESGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGURBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.97%

0.36%

+4.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.11%

0.85%

+9.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

0.95%

+11.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.42%

1.07%

+16.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.60%

1.07%

+17.53%

ESGU vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESGU vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

ESGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESGU
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF
0.95%0.99%1.18%1.43%1.58%1.06%1.27%1.32%1.73%1.82%
RBIL
F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF
4.38%3.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGU and RBIL have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESGU has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGU dropped -33.87% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

On 1-year performance, ESGU leads with 23.73% vs 4.07% for RBIL. On fees, ESGU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ESGU has performed better with a 23.73% return vs 4.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RBIL.

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 0.95% for ESGU.

ESGU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. ESGU tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for ESGU and 0.17% for RBIL.

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGU and RBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer