ESGU vs. CVLC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ESGU (iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF) and CVLC (Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ESGU tracks the MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index while CVLC tracks the Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESGU returned 22.00%/yr vs 22.30%/yr for CVLC. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.

Performance

ESGU vs. CVLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGU achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly lower than CVLC's 12.35% return.

ESGU

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 5.51%
• YTD: 11.06%
• 6M: 10.93%
• 1Y: 27.83%
• 3Y*: 22.00%
• 5Y*: 12.74%
• 10Y*: —

CVLC

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 5.88%
• YTD: 12.35%
• 6M: 12.15%
• 1Y: 29.31%
• 3Y*: 22.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGU vs. CVLC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ESGU iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF	11.06%	16.90%	24.31%	16.88%
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF	12.35%	16.13%	24.20%	17.14%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGU and CVLC is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023	0.98

The correlation between ESGU and CVLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGU vs. CVLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESGU	CVLC
Technology	38.7%	39.5%
Financial Services	11.5%	11.8%
Communication Services	9.8%	8.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	8.7%
Healthcare	8.4%	9.1%
Industrials	8.4%	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.9%	4.6%
Energy	3.5%	0.5%
Utilities	2.4%	2.2%
Real Estate	2.1%	2.7%
Basic Materials	1.6%	2.1%

Return for Risk

ESGU vs. CVLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGU

ESGU Risk / Return Rank: 67
ESGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
ESGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
ESGU Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ESGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
ESGU Martin Ratio Rank: 72

CVLC

CVLC Risk / Return Rank: 70
CVLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
CVLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
CVLC Omega Ratio Rank: 69
CVLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
CVLC Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGU vs. CVLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESGU	CVLC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.36	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	3.26	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.42	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	3.06	-0.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.75	14.09	-0.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESGU vs. CVLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGU Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the CVLC Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGU and CVLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESGU	CVLC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	2.36	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	1.37	-0.54

Drawdowns

ESGU vs. CVLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGU drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, which is greater than CVLC's maximum drawdown of -19.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGU and CVLC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESGU	CVLC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.87%	-19.92%	-13.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.26%	-9.61%	+0.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.32%	-19.92%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.79%	-0.73%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.89%	-2.41%	-2.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	2.09%	-0.06%

Volatility

ESGU vs. CVLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) is 2.92%, while Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF (CVLC) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that ESGU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESGU	CVLC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	3.36%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.20%	9.66%	-0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.16%	12.51%	-0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.32%	15.55%	+1.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.60%	15.55%	+3.05%

ESGU vs. CVLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ESGU and CVLC have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ESGU vs. CVLC - Dividend Comparison

ESGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than CVLC's 0.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CVLC Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index ETF	0.89%	1.02%	1.03%	0.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ESGU iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF	0.92%	0.99%	1.18%	1.43%	1.58%	1.06%	1.27%	1.32%	1.73%	1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESGU and CVLC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, ESGU and CVLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ESGU or CVLC?

CVLC has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to ESGU (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGU dropped -33.87% vs CVLC's -19.92%.

Which ETF is better, ESGU or CVLC?

On 3-year performance, CVLC leads with 22.30% vs 22.00% for ESGU. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, ESGU has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ESGU or CVLC?

Over the 3-year period, CVLC has performed better with a 22.30% return vs 22.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESGU or CVLC?

ESGU and CVLC have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESGU or CVLC?

ESGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.89% for CVLC.

What is the main difference between ESGU and CVLC?

ESGU tracks MSCI USA Extended ESG Focus Index, while CVLC tracks Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Calvert.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CVLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.