PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGR vs. PAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ESGR vs. PAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enstar Group Limited (ESGR) and Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ESGR

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PAM

1D
-1.84%
1M
4.65%
YTD
-4.93%
6M
-8.80%
1Y
9.76%
3Y*
29.75%
5Y*
37.79%
10Y*
13.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGR vs. PAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESGR
Enstar Group Limited
0.00%4.92%9.41%27.40%-6.68%20.84%-0.95%23.45%-16.53%1.54%
PAM
Pampa Energía S.A.
-4.93%0.65%77.58%55.04%51.30%53.19%-16.13%-48.35%-52.72%93.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGR and PAM is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2009

0.20

The correlation between ESGR and PAM shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

ESGR:

$1.20B

PAM:

$2.16B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ESGR:

$1.20B

PAM:

$682.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

ESGR:

$641.00M

PAM:

$1.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGR vs. PAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGR

PAM
PAM Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAM Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGR vs. PAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enstar Group Limited (ESGR) and Pampa Energía S.A. (PAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ESGR vs. PAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGRPAMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

Drawdowns

ESGR vs. PAM - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGRPAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.83%

Volatility

ESGR vs. PAM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGRPAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.95%

Dividends

ESGR vs. PAM - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESGR nor PAM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

ESGR vs. PAM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enstar Group Limited and Pampa Energía S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-400.00M-200.00M0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
204.00M
573.00M
(ESGR) Total Revenue
(PAM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGR and PAM have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGR and PAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer