PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGP.DE vs. SMLD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGP.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist (SMLD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGP.DE achieves a 6.87% return, which is significantly lower than SMLD.DE's 20.75% return.


ESGP.DE

1D
-0.72%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
6.87%
6M
8.16%
1Y
11.61%
3Y*
9.26%
5Y*
10Y*

SMLD.DE

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.52%
YTD
20.75%
6M
14.96%
1Y
13.71%
3Y*
20.56%
5Y*
25.24%
10Y*
15.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGP.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESGP.DE
HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF
6.87%5.79%12.94%2.10%-2.36%2.35%
SMLD.DE
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist
20.75%-8.86%35.22%27.59%49.18%10.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGP.DE and SMLD.DE is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between ESGP.DE and SMLD.DE has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGP.DE vs. SMLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGP.DE
ESGP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ESGP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SMLD.DE
SMLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGP.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist (SMLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGP.DESMLD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.15

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

0.92

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.36

1.91

+3.45

ESGP.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGP.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the SMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGP.DE and SMLD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGP.DESMLD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

0.51

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.29

+0.10

Drawdowns

ESGP.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGP.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum SMLD.DE drawdown of -73.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGP.DE and SMLD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGP.DESMLD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.50%

-73.78%

+53.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.31%

-14.77%

+8.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.50%

-22.99%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.57%

-3.47%

+0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-17.76%

+12.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

7.16%

-5.00%

Volatility

ESGP.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) is 3.24%, while Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist (SMLD.DE) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that ESGP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGP.DESMLD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

5.38%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.68%

12.79%

-4.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.29%

26.64%

-15.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

22.60%

-8.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.54%

34.70%

-20.16%

ESGP.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGP.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SMLD.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGP.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Dividend Comparison

ESGP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMLD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGP.DE
HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMLD.DE
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist
7.55%8.45%12.45%18.33%14.40%17.94%25.01%18.21%21.61%18.39%14.39%20.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGP.DE and SMLD.DE have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SMLD.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMLD.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ESGP.DE.

ESGP.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SMLD.DE is Energy Equities. ESGP.DE tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while SMLD.DE tracks Morningstar MLP Composite. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ESGP.DE and 0.50% for SMLD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGP.DE and SMLD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer