ESGP.DE vs. M9SD.DE
ESGP.DE (Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF) and M9SD.DE (Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF) are both Gold funds - ESGP.DE tracks the VettaFi Gold Miners Screened Index while M9SD.DE tracks the NYSE Arca Gold BUGS. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESGP.DE returned 11.10%/yr vs 32.32%/yr for M9SD.DE. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESGP.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for M9SD.DE.
Performance
ESGP.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGP.DE achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly higher than M9SD.DE's -15.61% return.
ESGP.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 8.35%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 15.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
M9SD.DE
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -20.85%
- 6M
- -24.71%
- YTD
- -15.61%
- 1Y
- 44.41%
- 3Y*
- 32.32%
- 5Y*
- 18.41%
- 10Y*
- 7.74%
ESGP.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGP.DE Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF | 11.42% | 5.79% | 12.94% | 2.10% | -2.36% | 2.90% |
M9SD.DE Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF | -15.61% | 130.74% | 20.64% | 2.95% | -2.13% | 6.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGP.DE and M9SD.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.37 |
The correlation between ESGP.DE and M9SD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGP.DE vs. M9SD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ESGP.DE
M9SD.DE
ESGP.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) and Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (M9SD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGP.DE | M9SD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.18 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 1.20 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | 2.93 | +3.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGP.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGP.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum M9SD.DE drawdown of -80.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGP.DE and M9SD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGP.DE | M9SD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -80.12% | +59.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.31% | -36.85% | +30.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.50% | -36.85% | +16.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -36.85% | +36.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -42.50% | +37.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 15.12% | -12.89% |
Volatility
ESGP.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) is 2.11%, while Market Access NYSE Arca Gold Bugs UCITS ETF (M9SD.DE) has a volatility of 13.07%. This indicates that ESGP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than M9SD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGP.DE | M9SD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.11% | 13.07% | -10.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.96% | 36.55% | -27.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.56% | 45.85% | -34.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 35.22% | -20.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 34.98% | -20.55% |
ESGP.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGP.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than M9SD.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGP.DE vs. M9SD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESGP.DE nor M9SD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGP.DE and M9SD.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESGP.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESGP.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for M9SD.DE.
ESGP.DE tracks VettaFi Gold Miners Screened Index, while M9SD.DE tracks NYSE Arca Gold BUGS. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and China Post Global. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ESGP.DE and 0.65% for M9SD.DE.
Find the right allocation for ESGP.DE and M9SD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer