ESGP.DE vs. IS0E.DE
ESGP.DE (Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF) and IS0E.DE (iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF) are both Gold funds - ESGP.DE tracks the VettaFi Gold Miners Screened Index while IS0E.DE tracks the S&P Commodity Producers Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESGP.DE returned 10.79%/yr vs 33.22%/yr for IS0E.DE. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESGP.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for IS0E.DE.
Performance
ESGP.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGP.DE achieves a 11.07% return, which is significantly higher than IS0E.DE's -13.29% return.
ESGP.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 9.14%
- YTD
- 11.07%
- 1Y
- 15.42%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IS0E.DE
- 1D
- -2.30%
- 1M
- -13.27%
- 6M
- -21.96%
- YTD
- -13.29%
- 1Y
- 47.37%
- 3Y*
- 33.22%
- 5Y*
- 18.53%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
ESGP.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGP.DE Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF | 11.07% | 5.79% | 12.94% | 2.10% | -2.36% | 2.90% |
IS0E.DE iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF | -13.29% | 129.59% | 18.76% | 6.25% | -3.74% | 3.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGP.DE and IS0E.DE is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGP.DE vs. IS0E.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ESGP.DE
IS0E.DE
ESGP.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) and iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGP.DE | IS0E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 1.38 | +1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.94 | 3.26 | +3.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGP.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGP.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum IS0E.DE drawdown of -82.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGP.DE and IS0E.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGP.DE | IS0E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -82.14% | +61.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.31% | -34.20% | +27.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.50% | -34.20% | +13.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -33.14% | +33.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.23% | -53.93% | +48.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 14.51% | -12.28% |
Volatility
ESGP.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) is 2.19%, while iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE) has a volatility of 14.27%. This indicates that ESGP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS0E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGP.DE | IS0E.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.19% | 14.27% | -12.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.02% | 35.95% | -26.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.58% | 44.53% | -32.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 33.10% | -18.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 32.29% | -17.85% |
ESGP.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGP.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IS0E.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGP.DE vs. IS0E.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESGP.DE nor IS0E.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGP.DE and IS0E.DE have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IS0E.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS0E.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ESGP.DE.
ESGP.DE tracks VettaFi Gold Miners Screened Index, while IS0E.DE tracks S&P Commodity Producers Gold. They also come from different issuers: HANetf and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ESGP.DE and 0.55% for IS0E.DE.
Find the right allocation for ESGP.DE and IS0E.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer