ESGP.DE vs. EUNJ.DE
ESGP.DE (HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF) and EUNJ.DE (iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - ESGP.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD while EUNJ.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESGP.DE returned 9.26%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for EUNJ.DE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
ESGP.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGP.DE achieves a 6.87% return, which is significantly lower than EUNJ.DE's 8.50% return.
ESGP.DE
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 6.87%
- 6M
- 8.16%
- 1Y
- 11.61%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EUNJ.DE
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 8.50%
- 6M
- 9.89%
- 1Y
- 13.18%
- 3Y*
- 9.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.36%
- 10Y*
- 7.05%
ESGP.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGP.DE HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 6.87% | 5.79% | 12.94% | 2.10% | -2.36% | 2.35% |
EUNJ.DE iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 8.50% | 6.56% | 11.50% | 1.85% | -1.18% | 0.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGP.DE and EUNJ.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021 | 0.97 |
The correlation between ESGP.DE and EUNJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGP.DE vs. EUNJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ESGP.DE
EUNJ.DE
ESGP.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) and iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGP.DE | EUNJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.20 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 2.14 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.36 | 6.18 | -0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGP.DE | EUNJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.14 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.35 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
ESGP.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGP.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum EUNJ.DE drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGP.DE and EUNJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGP.DE | EUNJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -36.95% | +16.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.31% | -6.13% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.50% | -20.39% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -2.02% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.31% | -6.94% | +1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 2.13% | +0.03% |
Volatility
ESGP.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (EUNJ.DE) at 3.04%. This indicates that ESGP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGP.DE | EUNJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 3.04% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.68% | 8.80% | -0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.29% | 11.57% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 14.61% | -0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 16.54% | -2.00% |
ESGP.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ESGP.DE and EUNJ.DE have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
ESGP.DE vs. EUNJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
ESGP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EUNJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGP.DE HANetf AuAg ESG Gold Mining UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EUNJ.DE iShares MSCI Pacific ex-Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.46% | 2.95% | 3.35% | 3.56% | 3.92% | 2.79% | 2.64% | 3.52% | 3.78% | 3.41% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, ESGP.DE and EUNJ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESGP.DE and EUNJ.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
ESGP.DE tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while EUNJ.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.
Find the right allocation for ESGP.DE and EUNJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer