ESGP.DE vs. ASWC.DE
ESGP.DE (Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF) and ASWC.DE (HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGP.DE is a Gold fund tracking the VettaFi Gold Miners Screened Index, while ASWC.DE is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the EQM Future of Defence Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESGP.DE returned 10.79%/yr vs 36.88%/yr for ASWC.DE. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESGP.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for ASWC.DE.
Performance
ESGP.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGP.DE achieves a 11.07% return, which is significantly lower than ASWC.DE's 14.68% return.
ESGP.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 9.14%
- YTD
- 11.07%
- 1Y
- 15.42%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ASWC.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 14.68%
- 1Y
- 16.73%
- 3Y*
- 36.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESGP.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGP.DE Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF | 11.07% | 5.79% | 12.94% | 2.42% |
ASWC.DE HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR | 14.68% | 38.30% | 39.36% | 14.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGP.DE and ASWC.DE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2023 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGP.DE vs. ASWC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ESGP.DE
ASWC.DE
ESGP.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) and HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGP.DE | ASWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.15 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 0.74 | +1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.94 | 1.40 | +5.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGP.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGP.DE drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum ASWC.DE drawdown of -22.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGP.DE and ASWC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGP.DE | ASWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -22.64% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.31% | -22.64% | +16.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.50% | -22.64% | +2.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.35% | +7.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.23% | -4.34% | -0.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 11.96% | -9.73% |
Volatility
ESGP.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gold Miners Screened UCITS ETF (ESGP.DE) is 2.19%, while HANetf Future of Defence UCITS ETF Acc EUR (ASWC.DE) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that ESGP.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASWC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGP.DE | ASWC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.19% | 7.01% | -4.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.02% | 16.35% | -7.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.58% | 30.22% | -18.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 22.90% | -8.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 22.90% | -8.46% |
ESGP.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGP.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ASWC.DE's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGP.DE vs. ASWC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESGP.DE nor ASWC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGP.DE and ASWC.DE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASWC.DE is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASWC.DE is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ESGP.DE.
ESGP.DE is categorized as Gold, while ASWC.DE is Aerospace & Defense. ESGP.DE tracks VettaFi Gold Miners Screened Index, while ASWC.DE tracks EQM Future of Defence Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ESGP.DE and 0.49% for ASWC.DE.
Find the right allocation for ESGP.DE and ASWC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer