ESGF.TO vs. ZMMK.TO
ESGF.TO (BMO ESG US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF) and ZMMK.TO (BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGF.TO is a Corporate Bonds fund managed by BMO, while ZMMK.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by BMO. Over the past 3 years, ESGF.TO returned 2.73%/yr vs 3.78%/yr for ZMMK.TO. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
ESGF.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGF.TO achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than ZMMK.TO's 1.17% return.
ESGF.TO
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 2.57%
- 3Y*
- 2.73%
- 5Y*
- -1.70%
- 10Y*
- —
ZMMK.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 1.17%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 2.50%
- 3Y*
- 3.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESGF.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGF.TO BMO ESG US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | -0.04% | 5.25% | -2.92% | 7.28% | -15.76% | -0.10% |
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 1.17% | 2.77% | 4.94% | 4.86% | 1.99% | 0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGF.TO and ZMMK.TO is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2021 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGF.TO vs. ZMMK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ESGF.TO
ZMMK.TO
ESGF.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO ESG US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ESGF.TO) and BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGF.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -21.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 5.25 | -4.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | 62.69 | -61.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | 351.07 | -349.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGF.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGF.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.55%, which is greater than ZMMK.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGF.TO and ZMMK.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGF.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -0.16% | -23.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.92% | -0.04% | -2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.77% | -0.08% | -8.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.58% | 0.00% | -10.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.59% | -0.00% | -10.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.29% | 0.01% | +1.28% |
Volatility
ESGF.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO ESG US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF (ESGF.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) at 0.07%. This indicates that ESGF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZMMK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGF.TO | ZMMK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 0.07% | +2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.76% | 0.19% | +3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.06% | 0.27% | +4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.34% | 0.34% | +15.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 0.34% | +15.39% |
Dividends
ESGF.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Dividend Comparison
ESGF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than ZMMK.TO's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGF.TO BMO ESG US Corporate Bond Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 4.39% | 4.14% | 4.08% | 4.06% | 3.77% | 2.93% | 2.75% |
ZMMK.TO BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series | 2.49% | 3.02% | 4.66% | 4.98% | 1.95% | 0.04% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGF.TO and ZMMK.TO have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESGF.TO is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ZMMK.TO is Money Market.
Find the right allocation for ESGF.TO and ZMMK.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer