PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGE vs. IWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGE vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGE achieves a 26.85% return, which is significantly higher than IWM's 17.07% return.


ESGE

1D
-1.23%
1M
9.37%
YTD
26.85%
6M
29.21%
1Y
55.02%
3Y*
24.13%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*

IWM

1D
-1.37%
1M
3.52%
YTD
17.07%
6M
15.83%
1Y
39.10%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
6.11%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGE vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESGE
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF
26.85%35.86%6.63%9.51%-22.41%-2.87%18.60%20.37%-15.24%38.86%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
17.07%12.66%11.38%16.83%-20.48%14.54%20.03%25.39%-11.12%14.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGE and IWM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2016

0.59

The correlation between ESGE and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGE vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGE
IWM

Technology

43.4%
19.5%

Financial Services

20.9%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
7.8%

Communication Services

7.2%
2.0%

Industrials

4.7%
17.1%

Basic Materials

4.1%
4.5%

Healthcare

2.4%
15.8%

Energy

2.2%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
2.1%

Utilities

1.5%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.1%
5.7%

Technology

ESGE
43.4%
IWM
19.5%

Financial Services

ESGE
20.9%
IWM
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGE
8.3%
IWM
7.8%

Communication Services

ESGE
7.2%
IWM
2.0%

Industrials

ESGE
4.7%
IWM
17.1%

Basic Materials

ESGE
4.1%
IWM
4.5%

Healthcare

ESGE
2.4%
IWM
15.8%

Energy

ESGE
2.2%
IWM
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

ESGE
2.1%
IWM
2.1%

Utilities

ESGE
1.5%
IWM
3.0%

Real Estate

ESGE
1.1%
IWM
5.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGE vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGE
ESGE Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ESGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IWM
IWM Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGE vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGEIWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.34

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

3.56

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.51

12.64

+2.87

ESGE vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGE Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGE and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGEIWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

2.05

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.27

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.37

+0.13

Drawdowns

ESGE vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGE drawdown since its inception was -41.07%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGE and IWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGEIWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.07%

-59.05%

+17.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.90%

-11.03%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.71%

-27.50%

+10.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.23%

-31.91%

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-1.49%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.47%

-10.77%

-3.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

3.10%

+0.46%

Volatility

ESGE vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 5.75%. This indicates that ESGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGEIWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.56%

5.75%

+2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.46%

13.53%

+3.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.10%

19.20%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.11%

22.52%

-3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

23.04%

-3.10%

ESGE vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESGE vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

ESGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than IWM's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGE
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF
1.97%2.50%2.41%2.64%2.68%2.66%1.31%2.59%2.19%1.86%0.27%0.00%
IWM
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
0.88%1.04%1.15%1.35%1.48%0.94%1.04%1.26%1.40%1.26%1.38%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGE and IWM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESGE has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to IWM (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGE dropped -41.07% vs IWM's -59.05%.

On 5-year performance, ESGE leads with 6.83% vs 6.11% for IWM. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWM has been the lower-risk option at 5.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESGE has performed better with a 6.83% return vs 6.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ESGE.

ESGE has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.88% for IWM.

ESGE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. ESGE tracks MSCI EM Extended ESG Focus Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ESGE and 0.19% for IWM.

ESGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGE and IWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer