ESGE vs. IEMG
ESGE (iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from iShares - ESGE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Extended ESG Focus Index while IEMG tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ESGE returned 8.88%/yr vs 8.84%/yr for IEMG. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. ESGE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.
Performance
ESGE vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGE achieves a 17.50% return, which is significantly higher than IEMG's 16.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ESGE having a 8.88% annualized return and IEMG not far behind at 8.84%.
ESGE
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- 6M
- 9.17%
- YTD
- 17.50%
- 1Y
- 34.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- 8.88%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.86%
IEMG
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- 6M
- 7.82%
- YTD
- 16.38%
- 1Y
- 32.88%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $53.52M | $39.94M | $58.74M | |
| $833.06M | $972.69M | $1.09B |
ESGE vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGE iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF | 17.50% | 35.86% | 6.63% | 9.51% | -22.41% | -2.87% | 18.60% | 20.37% | -15.24% | 38.86% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 16.38% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -14.92% | 37.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGE and IEMG is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2016 | 0.97 |
The correlation between ESGE and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESGE vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGE
IEMG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
ESGE
IEMG
Financial Services
ESGE
IEMG
Communication Services
ESGE
IEMG
Consumer Cyclical
ESGE
IEMG
Industrials
ESGE
IEMG
Basic Materials
ESGE
IEMG
Healthcare
ESGE
IEMG
Consumer Defensive
ESGE
IEMG
Energy
ESGE
IEMG
Utilities
ESGE
IEMG
Real Estate
ESGE
IEMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGE vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
ESGE
IEMG
ESGE vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGE | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.26 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 2.33 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 7.16 | +0.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGE vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGE drawdown since its inception was -41.07%, which is greater than IEMG's maximum drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGE and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGE | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.07% | -38.71% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.90% | -13.78% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.71% | -17.21% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.07% | -33.61% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.07% | -38.71% | -2.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.30% | -9.76% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.34% | -12.89% | -1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.58% | 4.47% | +0.11% |
Volatility
ESGE vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) have volatilities of 9.09% and 8.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGE | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.09% | 8.73% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.33% | 21.74% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.45% | 23.71% | +0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 19.27% | +0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.35% | 20.32% | +0.03% |
ESGE vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ESGE vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
ESGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than IEMG's 2.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGE iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF | 2.20% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 2.64% | 2.68% | 2.66% | 1.31% | 2.59% | 2.19% | 1.86% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.32% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, ESGE and IEMG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ESGE has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to IEMG (8.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGE dropped -41.07% vs IEMG's -38.71%.
On 10-year performance, ESGE leads with 8.88% vs 8.84% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IEMG has been the lower-risk option at 8.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ESGE has performed better with a 8.88% return vs 8.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ESGE.
IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 2.20% for ESGE.
ESGE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Extended ESG Focus Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ESGE and 0.09% for IEMG.
ESGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGE and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer