ESGE vs. EMXF

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

ESGE (iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF) and EMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds from iShares - ESGE tracks the MSCI EM Extended ESG Focus Index while EMXF tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGE returned 6.82%/yr vs 7.66%/yr for EMXF. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESGE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for EMXF.

Performance

ESGE vs. EMXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGE achieves a 22.18% return, which is significantly lower than EMXF's 24.26% return.

ESGE

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -1.39%
• 6M: 17.09%
• YTD: 22.18%
• 1Y: 39.72%
• 3Y*: 22.00%
• 5Y*: 6.82%
• 10Y*: —

EMXF

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 20.21%
• YTD: 24.26%
• 1Y: 37.57%
• 3Y*: 20.69%
• 5Y*: 7.66%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGE vs. EMXF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ESGE iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF	22.18%	35.86%	6.63%	9.51%	-22.41%	-2.87%	13.15%
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF	24.26%	29.40%	8.03%	6.63%	-18.99%	4.45%	15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGE and EMXF is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.89

The correlation between ESGE and EMXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGE vs. EMXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESGE	EMXF
Technology	43.9%	33.5%
Financial Services	22.0%	34.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.5%	5.0%
Communication Services	7.4%	8.4%
Industrials	5.7%	6.0%
Basic Materials	5.0%	2.7%
Healthcare	2.2%	3.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	2.9%
Energy	1.9%	0.0%
Utilities	1.3%	0.6%
Real Estate	1.0%	1.4%

Return for Risk

ESGE vs. EMXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGE

ESGE Risk / Return Rank: 66
ESGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
ESGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
ESGE Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ESGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
ESGE Martin Ratio Rank: 69

EMXF

EMXF Risk / Return Rank: 71
EMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
EMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
EMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
EMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGE vs. EMXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) and iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESGE	EMXF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.81	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	2.45	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.34	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	2.96	-0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.05	10.61	-0.56

ESGE vs. EMXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGE Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the EMXF Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGE and EMXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ESGE vs. EMXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGE drawdown since its inception was -41.07%, which is greater than EMXF's maximum drawdown of -33.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGE and EMXF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESGE	EMXF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.07%	-33.13%	-7.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.90%	-12.53%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.71%	-15.93%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.46%	-31.72%	-5.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.69%	-4.12%	-1.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.36%	-11.87%	-2.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.93%	3.49%	+0.44%

Volatility

ESGE vs. EMXF - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) has a higher volatility of 10.66% compared to iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) at 8.49%. This indicates that ESGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESGE	EMXF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.66%	8.49%	+2.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.18%	18.72%	+2.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.26%	20.53%	+2.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.80%	22.53%	-2.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.22%	21.97%	-1.75%

ESGE vs. EMXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXF's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ESGE vs. EMXF - Dividend Comparison

ESGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, less than EMXF's 2.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF	2.67%	3.43%	2.92%	2.25%	2.42%	1.87%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ESGE iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF	2.12%	2.50%	2.41%	2.64%	2.68%	2.66%	1.31%	2.59%	2.19%	1.86%	0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESGE and EMXF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, ESGE and EMXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ESGE or EMXF?

ESGE has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to EMXF (8.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGE dropped -41.07% vs EMXF's -33.13%.

Which ETF is better, ESGE or EMXF?

On 5-year performance, EMXF leads with 7.66% vs 6.82% for ESGE. On fees, EMXF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, EMXF has been the lower-risk option at 8.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ESGE or EMXF?

Over the 5-year period, EMXF has performed better with a 7.66% return vs 6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESGE or EMXF?

EMXF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for ESGE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESGE or EMXF?

EMXF has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 2.12% for ESGE.

What is the main difference between ESGE and EMXF?

ESGE tracks MSCI EM Extended ESG Focus Index, while EMXF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ESGE and 0.16% for EMXF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.