PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGD vs. XSAB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGD vs. XSAB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and iShares ESG Aware Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XSAB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESGD is traded in USD, while XSAB.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XSAB.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGD achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly higher than XSAB.TO's -0.41% return.


ESGD

1D
0.25%
1M
1.66%
YTD
9.13%
6M
10.49%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
15.55%
5Y*
7.96%
10Y*

XSAB.TO

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
-0.41%
6M
0.56%
1Y
0.92%
3Y*
2.97%
5Y*
-2.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGD vs. XSAB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
9.13%29.63%3.95%18.53%-15.17%11.79%8.20%12.10%
XSAB.TO
iShares ESG Aware Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
-0.41%7.11%-4.09%8.94%-16.70%-2.66%10.41%5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGD and XSAB.TO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2019

0.07

Over the past year, ESGD and XSAB.TO have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.07, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGD vs. XSAB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGD
ESGD Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
ESGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGD Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGD Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

XSAB.TO
XSAB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
XSAB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSAB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSAB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XSAB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSAB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGD vs. XSAB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and iShares ESG Aware Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XSAB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGDXSAB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.04

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

0.28

+1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.22

0.67

+5.55

ESGD vs. XSAB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGD Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is higher than the XSAB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGD and XSAB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESGD vs. XSAB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGD drawdown since its inception was -33.70%, which is greater than XSAB.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGD and XSAB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGDXSAB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.70%

-24.60%

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.68%

-3.91%

-7.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.86%

-8.74%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.03%

-24.23%

-5.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-11.10%

+10.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-10.08%

+3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

1.64%

+1.50%

Volatility

ESGD vs. XSAB.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to iShares ESG Aware Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (XSAB.TO) at 1.77%. This indicates that ESGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSAB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGDXSAB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

1.77%

+3.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.31%

4.64%

+8.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.85%

5.94%

+9.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.72%

9.14%

+7.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.00%

9.37%

+7.63%

ESGD vs. XSAB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XSAB.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ESGD vs. XSAB.TO - Dividend Comparison

ESGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than XSAB.TO's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
3.30%3.60%3.23%3.02%2.59%2.75%1.63%2.57%2.69%2.65%0.09%
XSAB.TO
iShares ESG Aware Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
3.26%3.20%3.01%2.81%2.75%2.35%2.49%2.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESGD and XSAB.TO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSAB.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSAB.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ESGD.

ESGD is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XSAB.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. ESGD tracks MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index, while XSAB.TO tracks Morningstar Can Core Bd GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ESGD and 0.17% for XSAB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGD and XSAB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer