PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGD vs. NUDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESGD vs. NUDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ESGD having a 8.31% return and NUDM slightly lower at 7.90%.


ESGD

1D
-0.81%
1M
3.52%
YTD
8.31%
6M
10.53%
1Y
20.25%
3Y*
15.89%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*

NUDM

1D
-0.62%
1M
4.14%
YTD
7.90%
6M
9.70%
1Y
21.49%
3Y*
16.01%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGD vs. NUDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
8.31%29.63%3.95%18.53%-15.17%11.79%8.20%23.12%-13.33%8.80%
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
7.90%29.60%5.47%17.70%-15.16%10.62%10.06%24.58%-14.82%8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGD and NUDM is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017

0.93

The correlation between ESGD and NUDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESGD vs. NUDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESGD
NUDM

Financial Services

26.4%
25.9%

Industrials

19.2%
21.2%

Technology

11.7%
12.1%

Healthcare

10.3%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
7.4%

Basic Materials

4.6%
5.4%

Communication Services

4.0%
4.5%

Energy

3.9%
0.7%

Utilities

3.9%
3.8%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.3%

Financial Services

ESGD
26.4%
NUDM
25.9%

Industrials

ESGD
19.2%
NUDM
21.2%

Technology

ESGD
11.7%
NUDM
12.1%

Healthcare

ESGD
10.3%
NUDM
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ESGD
7.6%
NUDM
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

ESGD
6.4%
NUDM
7.4%

Basic Materials

ESGD
4.6%
NUDM
5.4%

Communication Services

ESGD
4.0%
NUDM
4.5%

Energy

ESGD
3.9%
NUDM
0.7%

Utilities

ESGD
3.9%
NUDM
3.8%

Real Estate

ESGD
2.0%
NUDM
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESGD vs. NUDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGD
ESGD Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ESGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

NUDM
NUDM Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
NUDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
NUDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUDM Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGD vs. NUDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGDNUDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.25

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

1.73

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.53

6.46

+0.07

ESGD vs. NUDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGD Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the NUDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGD and NUDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGDNUDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.37

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.48

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.48

+0.09

Drawdowns

ESGD vs. NUDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGD drawdown since its inception was -33.70%, which is greater than NUDM's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGD and NUDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGDNUDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.70%

-32.01%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.68%

-12.50%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.86%

-13.47%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.03%

-30.09%

+0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-1.71%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-6.86%

+0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

3.34%

-0.23%

Volatility

ESGD vs. NUDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) is 4.88%, while Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that ESGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGDNUDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

5.22%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.59%

13.03%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.22%

15.74%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.61%

16.64%

-0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

17.59%

-0.62%

ESGD vs. NUDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NUDM's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESGD vs. NUDM - Dividend Comparison

ESGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than NUDM's 6.92% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESGD
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF
3.33%3.60%3.23%3.02%2.59%2.75%1.63%2.57%2.69%2.65%0.09%
NUDM
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF
6.92%7.46%3.33%3.14%1.98%4.31%1.47%3.42%2.45%0.47%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, ESGD and NUDM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NUDM has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to ESGD (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGD dropped -33.70% vs NUDM's -32.01%.

On 5-year performance, NUDM leads with 7.98% vs 7.90% for ESGD. On fees, ESGD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ESGD has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NUDM has performed better with a 7.98% return vs 7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESGD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUDM.

NUDM has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 3.33% for ESGD.

ESGD tracks MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index, while NUDM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG International DM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ESGD and 0.30% for NUDM.

NUDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGD and NUDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer