ESGD vs. NUDM
ESGD (iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF) and NUDM (Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - ESGD tracks the MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index while NUDM tracks the MSCI TIAA ESG International DM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGD returned 7.90%/yr vs 7.98%/yr for NUDM. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ESGD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for NUDM.
Performance
ESGD vs. NUDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ESGD having a 8.31% return and NUDM slightly lower at 7.90%.
ESGD
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 8.31%
- 6M
- 10.53%
- 1Y
- 20.25%
- 3Y*
- 15.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- —
NUDM
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 4.14%
- YTD
- 7.90%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 21.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- —
ESGD vs. NUDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGD iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF | 8.31% | 29.63% | 3.95% | 18.53% | -15.17% | 11.79% | 8.20% | 23.12% | -13.33% | 8.80% |
NUDM Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF | 7.90% | 29.60% | 5.47% | 17.70% | -15.16% | 10.62% | 10.06% | 24.58% | -14.82% | 8.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGD and NUDM is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between ESGD and NUDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
ESGD vs. NUDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGD
NUDM
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
ESGD
NUDM
Industrials
ESGD
NUDM
Technology
ESGD
NUDM
Healthcare
ESGD
NUDM
Consumer Cyclical
ESGD
NUDM
Consumer Defensive
ESGD
NUDM
Basic Materials
ESGD
NUDM
Communication Services
ESGD
NUDM
Energy
ESGD
NUDM
Utilities
ESGD
NUDM
Real Estate
ESGD
NUDM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGD vs. NUDM — Risk / Return Rank
ESGD
NUDM
ESGD vs. NUDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) and Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGD | NUDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 1.73 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.53 | 6.46 | +0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGD | NUDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.37 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.48 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
ESGD vs. NUDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGD drawdown since its inception was -33.70%, which is greater than NUDM's maximum drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGD and NUDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGD | NUDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.70% | -32.01% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.68% | -12.50% | +0.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.86% | -13.47% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.03% | -30.09% | +0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -1.71% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -6.86% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 3.34% | -0.23% |
Volatility
ESGD vs. NUDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF (ESGD) is 4.88%, while Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF (NUDM) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that ESGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGD | NUDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 5.22% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.59% | 13.03% | -0.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 15.74% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.61% | 16.64% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 17.59% | -0.62% |
ESGD vs. NUDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NUDM's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGD vs. NUDM - Dividend Comparison
ESGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than NUDM's 6.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGD iShares ESG Aware MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.33% | 3.60% | 3.23% | 3.02% | 2.59% | 2.75% | 1.63% | 2.57% | 2.69% | 2.65% | 0.09% |
NUDM Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF | 6.92% | 7.46% | 3.33% | 3.14% | 1.98% | 4.31% | 1.47% | 3.42% | 2.45% | 0.47% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, ESGD and NUDM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NUDM has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to ESGD (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGD dropped -33.70% vs NUDM's -32.01%.
On 5-year performance, NUDM leads with 7.98% vs 7.90% for ESGD. On fees, ESGD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ESGD has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, NUDM has performed better with a 7.98% return vs 7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESGD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for NUDM.
NUDM has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 3.33% for ESGD.
ESGD tracks MSCI EAFE Extended ESG Focus Index, while NUDM tracks MSCI TIAA ESG International DM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ESGD and 0.30% for NUDM.
NUDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGD and NUDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer