ESGB vs. MBS
ESGB (IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF) and MBS (Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESGB charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MBS.
Performance
ESGB vs. MBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ESGB
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBS
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 1Y
- 5.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESGB vs. MBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ESGB IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF | -0.18% |
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGB and MBS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGB vs. MBS — Risk / Return Rank
ESGB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MBS
ESGB vs. MBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF (ESGB) and Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (MBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGB | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.25 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGB vs. MBS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGB | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.09% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.12% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.02% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.77% | — |
Volatility
ESGB vs. MBS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGB | MBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.79% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 3.95% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 3.95% | — |
ESGB vs. MBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGB has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than MBS's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGB vs. MBS - Dividend Comparison
ESGB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ESGB IQ MacKay ESG Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MBS Angel Oak Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF | 5.67% | 5.28% | 4.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGB and MBS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESGB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESGB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MBS.
MBS has the higher dividend yield at 5.67%, compared with 0.00% for ESGB.
They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ESGB and 0.49% for MBS.
Find the right allocation for ESGB and MBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer