PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESG vs. QLVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESG vs. QLVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESG achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly higher than QLVD's 2.66% return.


ESG

1D
-0.45%
1M
7.28%
YTD
12.20%
6M
13.15%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
12.73%
10Y*

QLVD

1D
-0.68%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
2.66%
6M
4.87%
1Y
7.04%
3Y*
11.60%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESG vs. QLVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
12.20%16.04%20.22%27.86%-19.89%28.48%20.75%7.99%
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.66%24.21%4.67%11.57%-12.09%9.04%3.00%6.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ESG and QLVD is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.68

The correlation between ESG and QLVD shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESG vs. QLVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESG
QLVD

Technology

36.7%
5.0%

Financial Services

16.9%
24.3%

Healthcare

11.2%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
11.3%

Industrials

4.5%
15.3%

Energy

3.1%
3.9%

Basic Materials

3.0%
4.3%

Real Estate

2.7%
5.3%

Communication Services

1.0%
6.7%

Utilities

0.7%
7.9%

Technology

ESG
36.7%
QLVD
5.0%

Financial Services

ESG
16.9%
QLVD
24.3%

Healthcare

ESG
11.2%
QLVD
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ESG
10.0%
QLVD
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

ESG
9.2%
QLVD
11.3%

Industrials

ESG
4.5%
QLVD
15.3%

Energy

ESG
3.1%
QLVD
3.9%

Basic Materials

ESG
3.0%
QLVD
4.3%

Real Estate

ESG
2.7%
QLVD
5.3%

Communication Services

ESG
1.0%
QLVD
6.7%

Utilities

ESG
0.7%
QLVD
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESG vs. QLVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESG
ESG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ESG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ESG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESG Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

QLVD
QLVD Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
QLVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESG vs. QLVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGQLVDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.12

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

0.87

+2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.02

2.58

+10.44

ESG vs. QLVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESG Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the QLVD Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESG and QLVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGQLVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

0.67

+1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.50

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.48

+0.35

Drawdowns

ESG vs. QLVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESG drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than QLVD's maximum drawdown of -28.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESG and QLVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGQLVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-28.20%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-8.15%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.32%

-9.24%

-9.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-23.99%

-2.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-6.19%

+5.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-5.24%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.74%

-0.75%

Volatility

ESG vs. QLVD - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) have volatilities of 2.94% and 3.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGQLVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

3.02%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.46%

8.28%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.16%

10.52%

+0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

11.73%

+5.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

13.97%

+4.39%

ESG vs. QLVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ESG and QLVD have an expense ratio of 0.32%.


Dividends

ESG vs. QLVD - Dividend Comparison

ESG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than QLVD's 2.78% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
0.87%0.96%1.18%1.10%1.38%1.03%1.33%1.51%1.72%1.52%0.92%
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.78%2.87%3.01%3.33%2.47%3.06%1.78%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESG and QLVD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLVD has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to ESG (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESG dropped -32.53% vs QLVD's -28.20%.

On 5-year performance, ESG leads with 12.73% vs 5.83% for QLVD. Both ETFs have the same 0.32% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESG has performed better with a 12.73% return vs 5.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESG and QLVD have the same expense ratio: 0.32% per year.

QLVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.87% for ESG.

ESG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QLVD is Volatility Hedged Equity. ESG tracks STOXX USA ESG Select KPIs Index, while QLVD tracks Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index.

ESG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESG and QLVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer