PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESG vs. NACP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESG vs. NACP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESG achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.18% return.


ESG

1D
-0.45%
1M
7.28%
YTD
12.20%
6M
13.15%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
20.72%
5Y*
12.73%
10Y*

NACP

1D
-0.13%
1M
9.92%
YTD
22.18%
6M
20.98%
1Y
43.81%
3Y*
27.18%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESG vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
12.20%16.04%20.22%27.86%-19.89%28.48%20.75%31.74%-10.05%
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
22.18%21.38%23.93%29.69%-23.05%27.62%26.00%30.74%-8.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ESG and NACP is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018

0.91

The correlation between ESG and NACP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ESG vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ESG
NACP

Technology

36.7%
35.8%

Financial Services

16.9%
10.6%

Healthcare

11.2%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
3.6%

Industrials

4.5%
8.7%

Energy

3.1%
5.0%

Basic Materials

3.0%
1.5%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.3%

Communication Services

1.0%
9.8%

Utilities

0.7%
3.4%

Technology

ESG
36.7%
NACP
35.8%

Financial Services

ESG
16.9%
NACP
10.6%

Healthcare

ESG
11.2%
NACP
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ESG
10.0%
NACP
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

ESG
9.2%
NACP
3.6%

Industrials

ESG
4.5%
NACP
8.7%

Energy

ESG
3.1%
NACP
5.0%

Basic Materials

ESG
3.0%
NACP
1.5%

Real Estate

ESG
2.7%
NACP
1.3%

Communication Services

ESG
1.0%
NACP
9.8%

Utilities

ESG
0.7%
NACP
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESG vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESG
ESG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ESG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ESG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESG Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

NACP
NACP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NACP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NACP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESG vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGNACPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.54

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

4.56

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.02

20.04

-7.02

ESG vs. NACP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESG Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the NACP Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESG and NACP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGNACPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

3.14

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.92

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.93

-0.10

Drawdowns

ESG vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESG drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESG and NACP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGNACPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-30.96%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-9.65%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.32%

-19.66%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-27.89%

+1.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.13%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-5.75%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.19%

-0.20%

Volatility

ESG vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) is 2.94%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that ESG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGNACPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

4.44%

-1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.46%

11.13%

-2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.16%

14.02%

-2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.73%

17.47%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.36%

18.70%

-0.34%

ESG vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESG has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESG vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison

ESG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than NACP's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
0.87%0.96%1.18%1.10%1.38%1.03%1.33%1.51%1.72%1.52%0.92%
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
0.55%0.62%2.96%1.28%3.48%3.06%1.48%1.22%0.71%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ESG and NACP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NACP has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to ESG (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESG dropped -32.53% vs NACP's -30.96%.

On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.98% vs 12.73% for ESG. On fees, ESG is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, ESG has been the lower-risk option at 2.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 12.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESG is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.

ESG has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.

ESG tracks STOXX USA ESG Select KPIs Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ESG and 0.49% for NACP.

NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESG and NACP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer