PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESG vs. HYGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ESG vs. HYGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESG achieves a 11.73% return, which is significantly higher than HYGV's 1.84% return.


ESG

1D
-0.52%
1M
1.34%
6M
9.94%
YTD
11.73%
1Y
20.77%
3Y*
18.53%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
14.93%

HYGV

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.08%
6M
1.30%
YTD
1.84%
1Y
5.94%
3Y*
7.90%
5Y*
3.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESG vs. HYGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
11.73%16.04%20.22%27.86%-19.89%28.48%20.75%31.74%-10.02%
HYGV
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund
1.84%7.92%8.02%12.11%-12.60%5.93%8.01%15.76%-4.15%

Correlation

The correlation between ESG and HYGV is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018

0.72

The correlation between ESG and HYGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESG vs. HYGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESG
ESG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ESG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESG Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ESG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

HYGV
HYGV Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HYGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGV Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESG vs. HYGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESGHYGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.22

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.02

9.64

+0.38

ESG vs. HYGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESG Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the HYGV Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESG and HYGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESG vs. HYGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESG drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, which is greater than HYGV's maximum drawdown of -23.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESG and HYGV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGHYGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.53%

-23.47%

-9.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-2.68%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.32%

-5.56%

-12.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-17.12%

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-0.42%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-3.28%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

0.62%

+1.46%

Volatility

ESG vs. HYGV - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) at 0.85%. This indicates that ESG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESGHYGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.25%

0.85%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.20%

3.09%

+6.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.53%

3.84%

+7.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

7.60%

+9.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

9.14%

+9.17%

ESG vs. HYGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESG has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGV's 0.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

ESG vs. HYGV - Dividend Comparison

ESG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than HYGV's 7.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESG
FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund
0.87%0.96%1.18%1.10%1.38%1.03%1.33%1.51%1.72%1.52%0.92%
HYGV
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund
7.40%7.48%8.20%8.77%7.64%6.07%6.18%7.95%5.63%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ESG and HYGV have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ESG has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to HYGV (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESG dropped -32.53% vs HYGV's -23.47%.

On 5-year performance, ESG leads with 11.82% vs 3.31% for HYGV. On fees, ESG is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, HYGV has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ESG has performed better with a 11.82% return vs 3.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ESG is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for HYGV.

HYGV has the higher dividend yield at 7.40%, compared with 0.87% for ESG.

ESG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HYGV is High Yield Bonds. ESG tracks STOXX USA ESG Select KPIs Index, while HYGV tracks Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for ESG and 0.37% for HYGV.

ESG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESG and HYGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer