ESG vs. HTGC
ESG (FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the STOXX USA ESG Select KPIs Index, while HTGC (Hercules Capital, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, ESG returned 12.73%/yr vs 9.03%/yr for HTGC. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESG vs. HTGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESG achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly higher than HTGC's -14.37% return.
ESG
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 7.28%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 13.15%
- 1Y
- 25.90%
- 3Y*
- 20.72%
- 5Y*
- 12.73%
- 10Y*
- —
HTGC
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -5.03%
- YTD
- -14.37%
- 6M
- -14.09%
- 1Y
- -4.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.03%
- 10Y*
- 13.30%
ESG vs. HTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESG FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund | 12.20% | 16.04% | 20.22% | 27.86% | -19.89% | 28.48% | 20.75% | 31.74% | -5.17% | 22.78% |
HTGC Hercules Capital, Inc. | -14.37% | 3.54% | 33.33% | 42.91% | -10.42% | 26.50% | 14.49% | 39.86% | -6.86% | 1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESG and HTGC is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2016 | 0.43 |
The correlation between ESG and HTGC shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESG vs. HTGC — Risk / Return Rank
ESG
HTGC
ESG vs. HTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESG | HTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 0.99 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | -0.17 | +3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.02 | -0.40 | +13.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESG | HTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | -0.19 | +2.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.35 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.35 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
ESG vs. HTGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESG drawdown since its inception was -32.53%, smaller than the maximum HTGC drawdown of -68.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESG and HTGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESG | HTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.53% | -68.21% | +35.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.68% | -24.74% | +16.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.32% | -27.97% | +9.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -36.11% | +10.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -19.03% | +18.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -10.86% | +5.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 10.72% | -8.73% |
Volatility
ESG vs. HTGC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund (ESG) is 2.94%, while Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that ESG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESG | HTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 5.23% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.46% | 20.00% | -11.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.16% | 23.14% | -11.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 25.72% | -8.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 27.84% | -9.48% |
Dividends
ESG vs. HTGC - Dividend Comparison
ESG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than HTGC's 11.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESG FlexShares STOXX US ESG Select Index Fund | 0.87% | 0.96% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 1.38% | 1.03% | 1.33% | 1.51% | 1.72% | 1.52% | 0.92% | 0.00% |
HTGC Hercules Capital, Inc. | 11.89% | 9.99% | 9.56% | 11.40% | 13.77% | 9.76% | 9.02% | 9.49% | 11.40% | 9.45% | 8.79% | 10.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESG and HTGC have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HTGC has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to ESG (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESG dropped -32.53% vs HTGC's -68.21%.
ESG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESG and HTGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer