ESG.TO vs. PXS.TO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ESG.TO (Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF) and PXS.TO (Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD) are both exchange-traded funds - ESG.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index, while PXS.TO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESG.TO returned 16.47%/yr vs 16.09%/yr for PXS.TO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESG.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for PXS.TO.

Performance

ESG.TO vs. PXS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO) and Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESG.TO achieves a 12.07% return, which is significantly lower than PXS.TO's 18.28% return.

ESG.TO

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 2.79%
• YTD: 12.07%
• 6M: 9.96%
• 1Y: 29.40%
• 3Y*: 22.68%
• 5Y*: 16.47%
• 10Y*: —

PXS.TO

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 3.66%
• YTD: 18.28%
• 6M: 18.18%
• 1Y: 36.20%
• 3Y*: 23.80%
• 5Y*: 16.09%
• 10Y*: 14.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESG.TO vs. PXS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ESG.TO Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF	12.07%	10.99%	34.27%	25.18%	-14.64%	33.63%	22.64%
PXS.TO Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD	18.28%	13.64%	26.23%	12.41%	-2.47%	32.84%	0.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ESG.TO and PXS.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2020	0.43

The correlation between ESG.TO and PXS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESG.TO vs. PXS.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESG.TO	PXS.TO
Technology	37.9%	24.6%
Communication Services	12.6%	9.7%
Financial Services	12.3%	14.7%
Healthcare	10.6%	11.5%
Industrials	7.5%	8.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.1%	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.0%	8.8%
Energy	2.8%	7.7%
Real Estate	2.2%	2.4%
Utilities	2.0%	2.8%
Basic Materials	2.0%	3.3%

Return for Risk

ESG.TO vs. PXS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESG.TO

ESG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 74
ESG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
ESG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
ESG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
ESG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
ESG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 66

PXS.TO

PXS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 95
PXS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
PXS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PXS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PXS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PXS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESG.TO vs. PXS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO) and Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESG.TO	PXS.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	3.29	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	4.84	-1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.64	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.05	7.45	-4.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.14	26.52	-15.38

ESG.TO vs. PXS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the PXS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESG.TO and PXS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ESG.TO vs. PXS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESG.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.58%, smaller than the maximum PXS.TO drawdown of -31.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESG.TO and PXS.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESG.TO	PXS.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.58%	-31.87%	+9.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.68%	-4.88%	-4.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.63%	-16.36%	-3.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.58%	-16.36%	-6.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.31%	-0.12%	-1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.33%	-3.35%	-0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.65%	1.37%	+1.28%

Volatility

ESG.TO vs. PXS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF (ESG.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD (PXS.TO) at 3.28%. This indicates that ESG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESG.TO	PXS.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	3.28%	+1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.31%	8.35%	+1.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.67%	11.07%	+1.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.07%	13.29%	+1.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.59%	15.28%	+1.31%

ESG.TO vs. PXS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESG.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PXS.TO's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESG.TO vs. PXS.TO - Dividend Comparison

ESG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than PXS.TO's 1.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ESG.TO Invesco S&P 500 ESG Index ETF	0.75%	0.86%	0.92%	1.11%	1.38%	1.10%	0.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXS.TO Invesco RAFI U.S. Index ETF II CAD	1.22%	1.49%	1.53%	1.53%	1.80%	1.51%	2.51%	1.91%	1.84%	1.50%	1.62%	1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESG.TO and PXS.TO in my portfolio?

ESG.TO and PXS.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ESG.TO or PXS.TO?

On fees, ESG.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESG.TO or PXS.TO?

ESG.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for PXS.TO.

What is the main difference between ESG.TO and PXS.TO?

ESG.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while PXS.TO is Large Cap Value Equities. ESG.TO tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight ESG Leaders Select Index, while PXS.TO tracks RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ESG.TO and 0.46% for PXS.TO.