ESES.L vs. HMEF.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

ESES.L (Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF) and HMEF.L (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - ESES.L tracks the Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF while HMEF.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESES.L returned 7.51%/yr vs 7.35%/yr for HMEF.L. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep.

Performance

ESES.L vs. HMEF.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF (ESES.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESES.L achieves a 22.99% return, which is significantly higher than HMEF.L's 20.01% return.

ESES.L

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: -5.75%
• 6M: 17.36%
• YTD: 22.99%
• 1Y: 39.41%
• 3Y*: 18.98%
• 5Y*: 7.51%
• 10Y*: —

HMEF.L

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: -6.61%
• 6M: 13.86%
• YTD: 20.01%
• 1Y: 37.04%
• 3Y*: 18.83%
• 5Y*: 7.35%
• 10Y*: 44.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESES.L vs. HMEF.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ESES.L Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF	22.99%	24.05%	7.54%	2.94%	-11.14%	6,848.44%
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD	20.01%	24.56%	9.08%	2.44%	-10.01%	-5.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ESES.L and HMEF.L is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2021	0.97

The correlation between ESES.L and HMEF.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ESES.L vs. HMEF.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESES.L

ESES.L Risk / Return Rank: 80
ESES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ESES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ESES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 81
ESES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ESES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

HMEF.L

HMEF.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
HMEF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
HMEF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
HMEF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
HMEF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESES.L vs. HMEF.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF (ESES.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESES.L	HMEF.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.06	1.88	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	2.48	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.35	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	3.33	+0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.46	10.05	+1.40

ESES.L vs. HMEF.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESES.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the HMEF.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESES.L and HMEF.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ESES.L vs. HMEF.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESES.L drawdown since its inception was -23.59%, smaller than the maximum HMEF.L drawdown of -27.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESES.L and HMEF.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESES.L	HMEF.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.59%	-27.33%	+3.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.79%	-11.07%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.59%	-15.16%	-8.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.59%	-22.06%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.86%	-9.44%	+1.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.52%	-7.69%	-2.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	3.67%	-0.24%

Volatility

ESES.L vs. HMEF.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF (ESES.L) is 7.50%, while HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (HMEF.L) has a volatility of 8.82%. This indicates that ESES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HMEF.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESES.L	HMEF.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.50%	8.82%	-1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.04%	17.56%	-0.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.04%	19.59%	-0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.66%	16.78%	+4.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3,197.93%	142.57%	+3,055.36%

Dividends

ESES.L vs. HMEF.L - Dividend Comparison

ESES.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMEF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ESES.L Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HMEF.L HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD	1.70%	1.98%	2.43%	2.58%	2.99%	2.01%	1.66%	2.11%	2.14%	37.43%	168.62%	225.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESES.L and HMEF.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, ESES.L and HMEF.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

What is the main difference between ESES.L and HMEF.L?

ESES.L tracks Invesco MSCI Emerging Markets Universal Screened UCITS ETF, while HMEF.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and HSBC.