PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESE vs. CRDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ESE vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ESCO Technologies Inc. (ESE) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESE achieves a 51.28% return, which is significantly lower than CRDO's 54.47% return.


ESE

1D
0.94%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
51.28%
6M
49.13%
1Y
60.70%
3Y*
45.43%
5Y*
26.97%
10Y*
22.38%

CRDO

1D
7.43%
1M
17.91%
YTD
54.47%
6M
24.21%
1Y
204.65%
3Y*
138.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESE vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ESE
ESCO Technologies Inc.
51.28%46.96%14.15%34.13%12.99%
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
54.47%114.09%245.20%46.28%14.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ESE and CRDO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022

0.30

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ESE:

$7.65B

CRDO:

$42.83B

EPS

ESE:

$11.89

CRDO:

$2.50

PE Ratio

ESE:

24.84

CRDO:

89.06

PEG Ratio

ESE:

0.41

CRDO:

0.08

PS Ratio

ESE:

6.13

CRDO:

31.50

PB Ratio

ESE:

4.77

CRDO:

20.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

ESE:

$1.25B

CRDO:

$1.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ESE:

$271.43M

CRDO:

$908.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

ESE:

$238.72M

CRDO:

$463.79M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESE vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESE
ESE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ESE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ESE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDO
CRDO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESE vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ESCO Technologies Inc. (ESE) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESECRDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

3.84

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.69

9.27

+1.41

ESE vs. CRDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESE Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the CRDO Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESE and CRDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESECRDODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.43

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

1.20

-0.78

Drawdowns

ESE vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESE drawdown since its inception was -58.54%, smaller than the maximum CRDO drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESE and CRDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESECRDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.54%

-62.04%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.22%

-53.59%

+38.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.52%

-61.05%

+43.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.95%

-5.83%

-7.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.25%

-19.46%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.70%

22.17%

-16.47%

Volatility

ESE vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ESCO Technologies Inc. (ESE) is 11.76%, while Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a volatility of 28.82%. This indicates that ESE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESECRDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.76%

28.82%

-17.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.28%

64.61%

-39.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.78%

85.09%

-54.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.37%

81.41%

-51.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.51%

81.41%

-50.90%

Dividends

ESE vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison

ESE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, while CRDO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESE
ESCO Technologies Inc.
0.11%0.16%0.24%0.27%0.37%0.27%0.31%0.43%0.49%0.40%0.56%0.89%

Financials

ESE vs. CRDO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ESCO Technologies Inc. and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
309.34M
437.00M
(ESE) Total Revenue
(CRDO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ESE vs. CRDO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ESCO Technologies Inc. and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
-38.8%
68.2%
Portfolio components
ESE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ESCO Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of -119.92M and revenue of 309.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -38.8%.

CRDO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

ESE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ESCO Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 23.86M and revenue of 309.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.7%.

CRDO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.

ESE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ESCO Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 34.73M and revenue of 309.34M, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.

CRDO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ESE and CRDO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CRDO has higher volatility (28.82%) compared to ESE (11.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESE dropped -58.54% vs CRDO's -62.04%.

CRDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESE and CRDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer