PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESE vs. CIFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ESE vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ESCO Technologies Inc. (ESE) and Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESE achieves a 61.51% return, which is significantly higher than CIFR's 51.22% return.


ESE

1D
1.21%
1M
-7.22%
6M
38.25%
YTD
61.51%
1Y
62.98%
3Y*
46.58%
5Y*
27.65%
10Y*
22.54%
ALL TIME*
15.54%

CIFR

1D
-1.48%
1M
-2.28%
6M
39.85%
YTD
51.22%
1Y
308.79%
3Y*
84.92%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$699.13M$580.45M$601.55M
$56.05M$61.44M$84.23M

ESE vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESE
ESCO Technologies Inc.
61.51%46.96%14.15%34.13%-2.30%-1.15%
CIFR
Cipher Digital Inc.
51.22%218.10%12.35%637.50%-87.90%-54.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ESE and CIFR is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ESE:

$8.17B

CIFR:

$9.13B

EPS

ESE:

$11.89

CIFR:

-$2.32

PS Ratio

ESE:

6.54

CIFR:

49.45

PB Ratio

ESE:

5.09

CIFR:

12.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

ESE:

$1.25B

CIFR:

$174.98M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ESE:

$271.43M

CIFR:

-$172.84M

EBITDA (TTM)

ESE:

$238.72M

CIFR:

-$169.22M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ESE vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ESE
ESE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ESE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ESE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

CIFR
CIFR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ESE vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ESCO Technologies Inc. (ESE) and Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESECIFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

6.06

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.04

11.90

-1.86

ESE vs. CIFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESE Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the CIFR Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESE and CIFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ESE vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESE drawdown since its inception was -58.54%, smaller than the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESE and CIFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESECIFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.54%

-97.16%

+38.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.43%

-51.38%

+35.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.52%

-71.74%

+54.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.14%

-23.51%

+12.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.20%

-65.01%

+44.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.29%

26.14%

-19.85%

Volatility

ESE vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ESCO Technologies Inc. (ESE) is 10.28%, while Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) has a volatility of 46.50%. This indicates that ESE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESECIFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.28%

46.50%

-36.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.58%

79.79%

-52.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.96%

115.46%

-82.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.74%

122.42%

-91.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.74%

122.42%

-91.68%

Dividends

ESE vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison

ESE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, while CIFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIFR
Cipher Digital Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ESE
ESCO Technologies Inc.
0.10%0.16%0.24%0.27%0.37%0.27%0.31%0.43%0.49%0.40%0.56%0.89%

Financials

ESE vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ESCO Technologies Inc. and Cipher Digital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ESE and CIFR have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIFR has higher volatility (46.50%) compared to ESE (10.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESE dropped -58.54% vs CIFR's -97.16%.

CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESE and CIFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer