PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ES vs. FSUTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ES vs. FSUTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eversource Energy (ES) and Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ES achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly higher than FSUTX's 3.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ES has underperformed FSUTX with an annualized return of 5.44%, while FSUTX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.


ES

1D
0.38%
1M
3.48%
YTD
4.32%
6M
4.28%
1Y
10.16%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
5.44%

FSUTX

1D
0.51%
1M
-3.70%
YTD
3.35%
6M
3.29%
1Y
13.21%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
11.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ES vs. FSUTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ES
Eversource Energy
4.32%22.86%-2.46%-23.43%-5.06%8.18%4.45%34.49%6.41%17.97%
FSUTX
Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio
3.35%16.19%28.76%-1.12%5.20%17.64%0.75%22.68%8.41%17.94%

Correlation

The correlation between ES and FSUTX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 1984

0.54

The correlation between ES and FSUTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.73 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ES vs. FSUTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ES
ES Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ES Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
ES Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ES Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ES Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FSUTX
FSUTX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FSUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
FSUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ES vs. FSUTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eversource Energy (ES) and Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESFSUTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.15

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

1.52

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.46

3.41

-1.95

ES vs. FSUTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ES Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the FSUTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ES and FSUTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ES vs. FSUTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ES drawdown since its inception was -73.04%, which is greater than FSUTX's maximum drawdown of -66.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ES and FSUTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESFSUTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.04%

-66.73%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.13%

-9.21%

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

-15.20%

-13.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.69%

-20.15%

-21.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.69%

-37.61%

-4.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.32%

-7.63%

-5.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.06%

-11.25%

-7.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.30%

4.11%

+2.19%

Volatility

ES vs. FSUTX - Volatility Comparison

Eversource Energy (ES) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio (FSUTX) at 5.96%. This indicates that ES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSUTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESFSUTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.72%

5.96%

+1.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.00%

13.09%

+2.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.68%

16.35%

+8.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.94%

17.42%

+6.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.35%

19.40%

+4.95%

Dividends

ES vs. FSUTX - Dividend Comparison

ES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than FSUTX's 5.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ES
Eversource Energy
4.48%4.47%4.98%4.37%3.04%2.65%2.62%2.52%3.11%3.01%3.22%3.27%
FSUTX
Fidelity Select Utilities Portfolio
5.08%6.61%6.50%3.52%4.67%2.68%4.86%2.29%8.37%5.61%2.51%4.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


ES and FSUTX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ES has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to FSUTX (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ES dropped -73.04% vs FSUTX's -66.73%.

FSUTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ES and FSUTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer