PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ES vs. FSENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ES vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eversource Energy (ES) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ES achieves a 4.32% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 32.92% return. Over the past 10 years, ES has underperformed FSENX with an annualized return of 5.44%, while FSENX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.51% annualized return.


ES

1D
0.38%
1M
3.48%
YTD
4.32%
6M
4.28%
1Y
10.16%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
5.44%

FSENX

1D
-1.07%
1M
-4.06%
YTD
32.92%
6M
31.47%
1Y
41.02%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
21.65%
10Y*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ES vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ES
Eversource Energy
4.32%22.86%-2.46%-23.43%-5.06%8.18%4.45%34.49%6.41%17.97%
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
32.92%10.56%4.26%0.94%62.98%55.31%-32.51%9.90%-24.94%-2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between ES and FSENX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 1984

0.21

The correlation between ES and FSENX shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ES vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ES
ES Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ES Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
ES Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ES Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ES Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FSENX
FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ES vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eversource Energy (ES) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ESFSENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.36

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

4.48

-3.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.46

12.74

-11.28

ES vs. FSENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ES Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the FSENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ES and FSENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ES vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ES drawdown since its inception was -73.04%, roughly equal to the maximum FSENX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ES and FSENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ESFSENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.04%

-76.24%

+3.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.13%

-9.95%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

-25.85%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.69%

-28.02%

-13.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.69%

-72.11%

+30.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.32%

-6.57%

-6.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.06%

-17.00%

-2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.30%

3.49%

+2.81%

Volatility

ES vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison

Eversource Energy (ES) has a higher volatility of 7.72% compared to Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) at 6.56%. This indicates that ES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ESFSENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.72%

6.56%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.00%

15.63%

+0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.68%

19.77%

+4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.94%

27.31%

-3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.35%

30.93%

-6.58%

Dividends

ES vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison

ES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, more than FSENX's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ES
Eversource Energy
4.48%4.47%4.98%4.37%3.04%2.65%2.62%2.52%3.11%3.01%3.22%3.27%
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
1.61%1.95%1.95%1.98%2.50%2.25%3.43%1.84%1.48%1.74%0.62%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


ES and FSENX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ES has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to FSENX (6.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ES dropped -73.04% vs FSENX's -76.24%.

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ES and FSENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer