PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERY vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERY vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Energy Bear 2X Shares (ERY) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERY achieves a -44.59% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 53.14% return. Over the past 10 years, ERY has underperformed TNA with an annualized return of -33.88%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.99% annualized return.


ERY

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.11%
YTD
-44.59%
6M
-42.08%
1Y
-55.06%
3Y*
-28.20%
5Y*
-38.05%
10Y*
-33.88%

TNA

1D
4.51%
1M
8.55%
YTD
53.14%
6M
43.09%
1Y
130.31%
3Y*
31.74%
5Y*
-5.38%
10Y*
7.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERY vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERY
Direxion Daily Energy Bear 2X Shares
-44.59%-18.54%-5.58%-0.35%-73.61%-68.00%-11.94%-38.67%45.61%-5.67%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
53.14%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between ERY and TNA is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2008

-0.61

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between ERY and TNA has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.61 to -0.04, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERY vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERY
ERY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
ERY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERY Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERY Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
ERY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERY vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Energy Bear 2X Shares (ERY) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERYTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.32

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.92

4.03

-4.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.65

13.27

-14.91

ERY vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERY Sharpe Ratio is -1.36, which is lower than the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERY and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERYTNADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.36

2.30

-3.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.74

-0.08

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.48

0.12

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.55

0.23

-0.78

Drawdowns

ERY vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERY drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than TNA's maximum drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERY and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERYTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-88.09%

-11.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.79%

-32.53%

-27.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.94%

-65.78%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.04%

-82.36%

-11.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.66%

-88.09%

-11.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.99%

-35.23%

-64.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-96.93%

-33.90%

-63.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.47%

9.86%

+23.61%

Volatility

ERY vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Energy Bear 2X Shares (ERY) is 16.11%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 17.02%. This indicates that ERY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERYTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.11%

17.02%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.64%

40.45%

-7.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.81%

57.06%

-16.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.89%

67.34%

-15.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.62%

68.42%

+2.20%

ERY vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

ERY vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

ERY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than TNA's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERY
Direxion Daily Energy Bear 2X Shares
3.75%3.48%4.13%4.14%0.32%0.00%0.43%1.50%0.56%0.00%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.39%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERY and TNA have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNA has higher volatility (17.02%) compared to ERY (16.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERY dropped -99.99% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 10-year performance, TNA leads with 7.99% vs -33.88% for ERY. On fees, ERY is cheaper at 1.07% per year. On volatility, ERY has been the lower-risk option at 16.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TNA has performed better with a 7.99% return vs -33.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ERY is cheaper with a 1.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for TNA.

ERY has the higher dividend yield at 3.75%, compared with 0.39% for TNA.

ERY tracks Energy Select Sector Index (-300%), while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.07% for ERY and 1.14% for TNA.

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs -1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERY and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer