ERY vs. LINT
ERY (Direxion Daily Energy Bear 2X Shares) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. ERY is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ERY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.
Performance
ERY vs. LINT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERY achieves a -35.79% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 753.04% return.
ERY
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 12.20%
- YTD
- -35.79%
- 6M
- -36.68%
- 1Y
- -43.63%
- 3Y*
- -24.59%
- 5Y*
- -35.93%
- 10Y*
- -33.62%
LINT
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 6.51%
- YTD
- 753.04%
- 6M
- 785.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ERY vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ERY Direxion Daily Energy Bear 2X Shares | -35.79% | 2.13% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 753.04% | 5.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERY and LINT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERY vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank
ERY
LINT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ERY vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Energy Bear 2X Shares (ERY) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ERY | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ERY vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERY drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than LINT's maximum drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERY and LINT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERY | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -49.54% | -50.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -12.02% | -87.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -96.91% | -20.37% | -76.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.93% | — | — |
Volatility
ERY vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERY | LINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.48% | 167.69% | -126.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.86% | 167.69% | -115.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.53% | 167.69% | -97.16% |
ERY vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
ERY vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison
ERY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than LINT's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERY Direxion Daily Energy Bear 2X Shares | 2.87% | 3.48% | 4.13% | 4.14% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.43% | 1.50% | 0.56% |
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares | 0.32% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ERY and LINT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for ERY.
ERY has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 0.32% for LINT.
Their fees differ too: 1.07% for ERY and 0.97% for LINT.
Find the right allocation for ERY and LINT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer