PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERX vs. YINN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERX vs. YINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERX achieves a 59.95% return, which is significantly higher than YINN's -29.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ERX has outperformed YINN with an annualized return of -9.35%, while YINN has yielded a comparatively lower -18.37% annualized return.


ERX

1D
1.73%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
59.95%
6M
56.17%
1Y
70.63%
3Y*
20.97%
5Y*
27.98%
10Y*
-9.35%

YINN

1D
3.08%
1M
-23.37%
YTD
-29.95%
6M
-32.53%
1Y
-27.68%
3Y*
-6.43%
5Y*
-38.50%
10Y*
-18.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERX vs. YINN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
59.95%2.79%1.09%-12.26%130.58%111.91%-91.60%17.13%-55.94%-11.60%
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
-29.95%54.21%36.06%-53.08%-71.97%-58.56%-7.75%28.92%-48.47%129.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ERX and YINN is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2009

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between ERX and YINN has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ERX vs. YINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ERX
YINN

Energy

100.0%
5.6%

Basic Materials

-

4.2%

Communication Services

-

15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

-

27.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.9%

Financial Services

-

34.7%

Healthcare

-

2.3%

Industrials

-

2.4%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

-

5.5%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Energy

ERX
100.0%
YINN
5.6%

Basic Materials

ERX

-

YINN
4.2%

Communication Services

ERX

-

YINN
15.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ERX

-

YINN
27.4%

Consumer Defensive

ERX

-

YINN
0.9%

Financial Services

ERX

-

YINN
34.7%

Healthcare

ERX

-

YINN
2.3%

Industrials

ERX

-

YINN
2.4%

Real Estate

ERX

-

YINN
1.0%

Technology

ERX

-

YINN
5.5%

Utilities

ERX

-

YINN
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERX vs. YINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERX
ERX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

YINN
YINN Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERX vs. YINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) and Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ERXYINNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.96

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

-0.56

+3.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.87

-1.09

+8.96

ERX vs. YINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the YINN Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERX and YINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERX vs. YINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERX drawdown since its inception was -99.54%, roughly equal to the maximum YINN drawdown of -98.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERX and YINN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERXYINNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.54%

-98.87%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.34%

-49.61%

+26.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.34%

-69.08%

+26.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.90%

-96.28%

+49.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.59%

-98.59%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.93%

-97.52%

+5.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.06%

-68.51%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.00%

25.53%

-16.53%

Volatility

ERX vs. YINN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) is 14.44%, while Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a volatility of 18.63%. This indicates that ERX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERXYINNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.44%

18.63%

-4.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.89%

42.54%

-8.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.24%

58.74%

-17.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.06%

94.19%

-42.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.11%

81.73%

-12.62%

ERX vs. YINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is lower than YINN's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

ERX vs. YINN - Dividend Comparison

ERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than YINN's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
1.68%2.54%2.94%3.17%2.23%2.16%2.35%1.56%3.10%0.85%
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
1.42%1.12%1.81%4.17%1.16%0.73%0.76%1.38%1.02%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERX and YINN have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YINN has higher volatility (18.63%) compared to ERX (14.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERX dropped -99.54% vs YINN's -98.87%.

On 10-year performance, ERX leads with -9.35% vs -18.37% for YINN. On fees, ERX is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, ERX has been the lower-risk option at 14.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ERX has performed better with a -9.35% return vs -18.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ERX is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.

ERX has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.42% for YINN.

ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (300%), while YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.09% for ERX and 1.52% for YINN.

ERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERX and YINN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer