PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERX vs. WTIU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ERX vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ERX vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
85.42%2.79%1.09%-12.82%
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
141.86%-17.13%-29.63%-28.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERX achieves a 85.42% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 141.86% return.


ERX

1D
-2.61%
1M
20.58%
YTD
85.42%
6M
84.60%
1Y
61.51%
3Y*
24.14%
5Y*
36.55%
10Y*
-5.60%

WTIU

1D
-5.22%
1M
43.87%
YTD
141.86%
6M
115.33%
1Y
68.67%
3Y*
6.81%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ERX vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

ERX vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERX
ERX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

WTIU
WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERX vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERXWTIUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

0.85

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

1.47

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.21

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

1.42

+0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.79

2.65

+1.14

ERX vs. WTIU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the WTIU Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERX and WTIU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERXWTIUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

0.85

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.08

0.00

-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between ERX and WTIU is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ERX vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

ERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
1.45%2.54%2.94%3.17%2.23%2.16%2.35%1.56%3.10%0.85%
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ERX vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERX drawdown since its inception was -99.54%, which is greater than WTIU's maximum drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERX and WTIU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ERXWTIUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.54%

-75.73%

-23.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.17%

-53.11%

+17.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.64%

-14.27%

-76.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.77%

-39.51%

-27.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.25%

28.50%

-11.25%

Volatility

ERX vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) is 10.19%, while MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a volatility of 17.75%. This indicates that ERX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ERXWTIUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.19%

17.75%

-7.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.10%

44.75%

-16.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.61%

80.86%

-31.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.12%

69.25%

-17.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.23%

69.25%

-0.02%