ERX vs. QTAP
ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. ERX is passively managed, while QTAP is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ERX returned 28.75%/yr vs 13.78%/yr for QTAP. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ERX charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
ERX vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERX achieves a 66.93% return, which is significantly higher than QTAP's 14.67% return.
ERX
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- 66.93%
- 6M
- 59.74%
- 1Y
- 90.37%
- 3Y*
- 23.69%
- 5Y*
- 28.75%
- 10Y*
- -8.79%
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 14.67%
- 6M
- 15.56%
- 1Y
- 25.59%
- 3Y*
- 21.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.78%
- 10Y*
- —
ERX vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 66.93% | 2.79% | 1.09% | -12.26% | 130.58% | 21.78% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 14.67% | 19.36% | 17.34% | 43.32% | -25.87% | 15.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERX and QTAP is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | 0.18 |
The correlation between ERX and QTAP shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ERX vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ERX
QTAP
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
ERX
QTAP
Basic Materials
ERX
-
QTAP
Communication Services
ERX
-
QTAP
Consumer Cyclical
ERX
-
QTAP
Consumer Defensive
ERX
-
QTAP
Financial Services
ERX
-
QTAP
Healthcare
ERX
-
QTAP
Industrials
ERX
-
QTAP
Real Estate
ERX
-
QTAP
Technology
ERX
-
QTAP
Utilities
ERX
-
QTAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERX vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
ERX
QTAP
ERX vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ERX | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 2.23 | -0.90 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.89 | 15.20 | -11.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.60 | 80.04 | -69.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ERX | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 4.62 | -2.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.73 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.75 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
ERX vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERX drawdown since its inception was -99.54%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERX and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERX | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.54% | -29.44% | -70.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.34% | -1.69% | -21.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.34% | -13.03% | -29.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.90% | -29.44% | -17.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.57% | -0.10% | -91.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.02% | -5.04% | -61.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.57% | 0.32% | +8.25% |
Volatility
ERX vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) has a higher volatility of 16.49% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 1.33%. This indicates that ERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERX | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.49% | 1.33% | +15.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.45% | 3.97% | +29.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.14% | 5.56% | +35.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.98% | 18.89% | +33.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.18% | 18.77% | +50.41% |
ERX vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ERX vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
ERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.61% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ERX and QTAP have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ERX has higher volatility (16.49%) compared to QTAP (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERX dropped -99.54% vs QTAP's -29.44%.
On 5-year performance, ERX leads with 28.75% vs 13.78% for QTAP. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ERX has performed better with a 28.75% return vs 13.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.
ERX has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for ERX and 0.79% for QTAP.
QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ERX and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer