PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERX vs. QTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERX vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERX achieves a 66.93% return, which is significantly higher than QTAP's 14.67% return.


ERX

1D
2.68%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
66.93%
6M
59.74%
1Y
90.37%
3Y*
23.69%
5Y*
28.75%
10Y*
-8.79%

QTAP

1D
-0.10%
1M
2.89%
YTD
14.67%
6M
15.56%
1Y
25.59%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERX vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
66.93%2.79%1.09%-12.26%130.58%21.78%
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
14.67%19.36%17.34%43.32%-25.87%15.63%

Correlation

The correlation between ERX and QTAP is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021

0.18

The correlation between ERX and QTAP shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ERX vs. QTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ERX
QTAP

Energy

100.0%
0.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.3%

Communication Services

-

15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.7%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

5.1%

Industrials

-

3.3%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

50.7%

Utilities

-

1.6%

Energy

ERX
100.0%
QTAP
0.7%

Basic Materials

ERX

-

QTAP
1.3%

Communication Services

ERX

-

QTAP
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ERX

-

QTAP
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

ERX

-

QTAP
8.7%

Financial Services

ERX

-

QTAP
0.2%

Healthcare

ERX

-

QTAP
5.1%

Industrials

ERX

-

QTAP
3.3%

Real Estate

ERX

-

QTAP
0.1%

Technology

ERX

-

QTAP
50.7%

Utilities

ERX

-

QTAP
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERX vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERX
ERX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERX vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERXQTAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

2.23

-0.90

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.89

15.20

-11.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.60

80.04

-69.45

ERX vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERX and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERXQTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

4.62

-2.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.73

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.75

-0.84

Drawdowns

ERX vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERX drawdown since its inception was -99.54%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERX and QTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERXQTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.54%

-29.44%

-70.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.34%

-1.69%

-21.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.34%

-13.03%

-29.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.90%

-29.44%

-17.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.57%

-0.10%

-91.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.02%

-5.04%

-61.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.57%

0.32%

+8.25%

Volatility

ERX vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) has a higher volatility of 16.49% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 1.33%. This indicates that ERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERXQTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.49%

1.33%

+15.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.45%

3.97%

+29.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.14%

5.56%

+35.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.98%

18.89%

+33.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.18%

18.77%

+50.41%

ERX vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

ERX vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

ERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
1.61%2.54%2.94%3.17%2.23%2.16%2.35%1.56%3.10%0.85%
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERX and QTAP have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ERX has higher volatility (16.49%) compared to QTAP (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERX dropped -99.54% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

On 5-year performance, ERX leads with 28.75% vs 13.78% for QTAP. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ERX has performed better with a 28.75% return vs 13.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.

ERX has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.

They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for ERX and 0.79% for QTAP.

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERX and QTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer