ERX vs. BULZ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) and BULZ (MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - ERX tracks the Energy Select Sector Index (300%) while BULZ tracks the Solactive FANG Innovation. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ERX returned 20.97%/yr vs 77.02%/yr for BULZ. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ERX charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BULZ.

Performance

ERX vs. BULZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERX achieves a 59.95% return, which is significantly higher than BULZ's 54.96% return.

ERX

• 1D: 1.73%
• 1M: -1.29%
• YTD: 59.95%
• 6M: 56.17%
• 1Y: 70.63%
• 3Y*: 20.97%
• 5Y*: 27.98%
• 10Y*: -9.35%

BULZ

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: -11.00%
• YTD: 54.96%
• 6M: 57.61%
• 1Y: 163.08%
• 3Y*: 77.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERX vs. BULZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares	59.95%	2.79%	1.09%	-12.26%	130.58%	35.79%
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	54.96%	60.09%	54.09%	394.22%	-92.26%	9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ERX and BULZ is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2021	0.15

The correlation between ERX and BULZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ERX vs. BULZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ERX	BULZ
Energy	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	25.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	62.3%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

ERX vs. BULZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERX

ERX Risk / Return Rank: 56
ERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
ERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
ERX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
ERX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

BULZ

BULZ Risk / Return Rank: 63
BULZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
BULZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BULZ Omega Ratio Rank: 59
BULZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
BULZ Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERX vs. BULZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) and MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ERX	BULZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	2.12	-0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.36	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.32	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	3.03	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.87	7.94	-0.07

ERX vs. BULZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the BULZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERX and BULZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ERX vs. BULZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERX drawdown since its inception was -99.54%, which is greater than BULZ's maximum drawdown of -94.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERX and BULZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ERX	BULZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.54%	-94.44%	-5.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.34%	-54.22%	+30.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.34%	-67.96%	+25.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.59%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.93%	-26.99%	-64.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.06%	-58.18%	-8.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.00%	20.62%	-11.62%

Volatility

ERX vs. BULZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) is 14.44%, while MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN (BULZ) has a volatility of 30.02%. This indicates that ERX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BULZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ERX	BULZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.44%	30.02%	-15.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.89%	61.86%	-27.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.24%	77.55%	-36.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.06%	91.54%	-39.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.11%	91.54%	-22.43%

ERX vs. BULZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERX has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BULZ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

ERX vs. BULZ - Dividend Comparison

ERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while BULZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BULZ MicroSectors Solactive FANG & Innovation 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares	1.68%	2.54%	2.94%	3.17%	2.23%	2.16%	2.35%	1.56%	3.10%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ERX and BULZ in my portfolio?

ERX and BULZ have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ERX or BULZ?

BULZ has higher volatility (30.02%) compared to ERX (14.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERX dropped -99.54% vs BULZ's -94.44%.

Which ETF is better, ERX or BULZ?

On 3-year performance, BULZ leads with 77.02% vs 20.97% for ERX. On fees, BULZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, ERX has been the lower-risk option at 14.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ERX or BULZ?

Over the 3-year period, BULZ has performed better with a 77.02% return vs 20.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ERX or BULZ?

BULZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ERX or BULZ?

ERX has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.00% for BULZ.

What is the main difference between ERX and BULZ?

ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (300%), while BULZ tracks Solactive FANG Innovation. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for ERX and 0.95% for BULZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BULZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.