PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERTH vs. HYDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERTH vs. HYDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) and Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERTH achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly lower than HYDR's 110.14% return.


ERTH

1D
-1.09%
1M
3.19%
YTD
8.02%
6M
9.21%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
3.35%
5Y*
-3.76%
10Y*
7.44%

HYDR

1D
-4.74%
1M
13.61%
YTD
110.14%
6M
86.55%
1Y
256.71%
3Y*
15.56%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERTH vs. HYDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ERTH
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
8.02%18.47%-13.56%0.12%-27.59%1.51%
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
110.14%43.73%-33.08%-36.49%-47.24%-13.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ERTH and HYDR is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021

0.76

The correlation between ERTH and HYDR shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ERTH vs. HYDR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ERTH
HYDR

Real Estate

26.7%

-

Industrials

21.0%
84.7%

Consumer Cyclical

14.3%
2.3%

Technology

10.5%
0.5%

Energy

8.5%
0.4%

Utilities

6.5%

-

Basic Materials

2.3%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%

-

Financial Services

0.3%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

ERTH
26.7%
HYDR

-

Industrials

ERTH
21.0%
HYDR
84.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ERTH
14.3%
HYDR
2.3%

Technology

ERTH
10.5%
HYDR
0.5%

Energy

ERTH
8.5%
HYDR
0.4%

Utilities

ERTH
6.5%
HYDR

-

Basic Materials

ERTH
2.3%
HYDR
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

ERTH
2.1%
HYDR

-

Financial Services

ERTH
0.3%
HYDR

-

Communication Services

ERTH

-

HYDR

-

Healthcare

ERTH

-

HYDR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERTH vs. HYDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERTH
ERTH Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ERTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERTH Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
ERTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERTH Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

HYDR
HYDR Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HYDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDR Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERTH vs. HYDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) and Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERTHHYDRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

4.78

-3.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.93

4.63

-2.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.55

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

8.69

-5.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.79

20.46

-12.67

ERTH vs. HYDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the HYDR Sharpe Ratio of 4.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERTH and HYDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERTHHYDRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

4.78

-3.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

-0.22

+0.43

Drawdowns

ERTH vs. HYDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERTH drawdown since its inception was -64.45%, smaller than the maximum HYDR drawdown of -89.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERTH and HYDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERTHHYDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.45%

-89.28%

+24.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-29.76%

+21.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.82%

-70.32%

+36.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.23%

-51.75%

+24.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.47%

-64.21%

+42.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

12.61%

-9.71%

Volatility

ERTH vs. HYDR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) is 5.20%, while Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) has a volatility of 18.76%. This indicates that ERTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERTHHYDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

18.76%

-13.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.80%

35.49%

-23.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.73%

54.28%

-37.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.85%

47.22%

-24.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.62%

47.22%

-24.60%

ERTH vs. HYDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERTH has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than HYDR's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ERTH vs. HYDR - Dividend Comparison

ERTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than HYDR's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERTH
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF
1.38%1.46%1.00%1.28%1.22%15.33%0.21%0.71%0.61%0.87%1.06%0.79%
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
1.82%3.82%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERTH and HYDR have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYDR has higher volatility (18.76%) compared to ERTH (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERTH dropped -64.45% vs HYDR's -89.28%.

On 3-year performance, HYDR leads with 15.56% vs 3.35% for ERTH. On fees, HYDR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, ERTH has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HYDR has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 3.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYDR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ERTH.

HYDR has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.38% for ERTH.

ERTH tracks MSCI Global Environment Select Index, while HYDR tracks Solactive Global Hydrogen Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ERTH and 0.50% for HYDR.

HYDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.78 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERTH and HYDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer