PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERNU.L vs. SLXX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERNU.L vs. SLXX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) and iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SLXX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERNU.L achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly higher than SLXX.L's -0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ERNU.L has outperformed SLXX.L with an annualized return of 3.51%, while SLXX.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.80% annualized return.


ERNU.L

1D
0.09%
1M
1.33%
YTD
1.86%
6M
1.30%
1Y
5.39%
3Y*
2.46%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*
3.51%

SLXX.L

1D
0.21%
1M
2.07%
YTD
-0.09%
6M
0.15%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
5.83%
5Y*
-0.77%
10Y*
1.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERNU.L vs. SLXX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
1.86%-2.45%7.39%-0.34%13.45%1.52%-2.17%-0.16%7.99%-7.61%
SLXX.L
iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF
-0.09%6.50%1.60%8.54%-18.36%-4.01%9.03%11.30%-2.77%4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ERNU.L and SLXX.L is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2013

0.00

The correlation between ERNU.L and SLXX.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.34 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERNU.L vs. SLXX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERNU.L
ERNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

SLXX.L
SLXX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SLXX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLXX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLXX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SLXX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLXX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERNU.L vs. SLXX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) and iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SLXX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERNU.LSLXX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.16

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.11

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.09

3.47

-0.38

ERNU.L vs. SLXX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the SLXX.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERNU.L and SLXX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERNU.LSLXX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.85

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

-0.10

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.22

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.44

-0.02

Drawdowns

ERNU.L vs. SLXX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERNU.L drawdown since its inception was -14.92%, smaller than the maximum SLXX.L drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERNU.L and SLXX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERNU.LSLXX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.92%

-30.27%

+15.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.43%

-4.25%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.54%

-4.25%

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.92%

-29.34%

+14.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.92%

-30.27%

+15.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.01%

-8.12%

+4.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-5.61%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.37%

+0.37%

Volatility

ERNU.L vs. SLXX.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) and iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SLXX.L) have volatilities of 2.03% and 2.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERNU.LSLXX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.03%

2.11%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.72%

4.81%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.46%

5.59%

+0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.36%

8.06%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.34%

8.08%

+1.26%

ERNU.L vs. SLXX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERNU.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than SLXX.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ERNU.L vs. SLXX.L - Dividend Comparison

ERNU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.69%, more than SLXX.L's 4.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
5.69%4.68%5.45%5.00%1.55%0.48%1.65%2.77%2.17%1.43%0.93%0.70%
SLXX.L
iShares Core £ Corp Bond UCITS ETF
4.93%4.82%4.68%4.06%2.75%2.06%2.12%2.44%2.71%2.73%2.99%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERNU.L and SLXX.L have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERNU.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERNU.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SLXX.L.

ERNU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while SLXX.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP Liquid Corporates Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ERNU.L and 0.20% for SLXX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERNU.L and SLXX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer