PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERNU.L vs. AT1D.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERNU.L vs. AT1D.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) and Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (AT1D.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ERNU.L is traded in GBP, while AT1D.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AT1D.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERNU.L achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly lower than AT1D.L's 2.72% return.


ERNU.L

1D
-0.66%
1M
-0.09%
6M
1.60%
YTD
1.85%
1Y
3.51%
3Y*
4.10%
5Y*
4.28%
10Y*
2.57%

AT1D.L

1D
0.16%
1M
0.67%
6M
2.10%
YTD
2.72%
1Y
7.35%
3Y*
10.04%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERNU.L vs. AT1D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
1.85%-2.44%7.39%-0.34%13.44%1.53%-2.16%-0.16%3.36%
AT1D.L
Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist
2.72%3.15%12.17%-3.30%1.10%4.76%4.84%14.79%-23.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ERNU.L and AT1D.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2018

0.65

The correlation between ERNU.L and AT1D.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.75 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERNU.L vs. AT1D.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERNU.L
ERNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

AT1D.L
AT1D.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
AT1D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AT1D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AT1D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
AT1D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
AT1D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERNU.L vs. AT1D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) and Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (AT1D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ERNU.LAT1D.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.22

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

2.42

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.01

6.82

-4.82

ERNU.L vs. AT1D.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the AT1D.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERNU.L and AT1D.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERNU.L vs. AT1D.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERNU.L drawdown since its inception was -41.55%, which is greater than AT1D.L's maximum drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERNU.L and AT1D.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERNU.LAT1D.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.55%

-27.40%

-14.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.43%

-3.35%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.54%

-9.14%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.92%

-22.70%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.03%

-1.32%

-2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.45%

-8.42%

-10.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.19%

+0.55%

Volatility

ERNU.L vs. AT1D.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) has a higher volatility of 1.80% compared to Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist (AT1D.L) at 1.70%. This indicates that ERNU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AT1D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERNU.LAT1D.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.80%

1.70%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.81%

4.74%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.42%

6.49%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.35%

9.88%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.73%

14.08%

-5.35%

ERNU.L vs. AT1D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERNU.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than AT1D.L's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

ERNU.L vs. AT1D.L - Dividend Comparison

ERNU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than AT1D.L's 5.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AT1D.L
Invesco USD AT1 CoCo Bond UCITS ETF USD Dist
5.99%6.07%6.14%6.24%5.79%4.25%5.63%5.59%1.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
4.35%4.68%5.46%4.99%1.56%0.48%1.65%2.77%2.17%1.43%0.93%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERNU.L and AT1D.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERNU.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERNU.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for AT1D.L.

ERNU.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while AT1D.L is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. ERNU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while AT1D.L tracks iBoxx USD Contingent Convertible Liquid Developed Market AT1 (8% Issuer Cap) Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ERNU.L and 0.39% for AT1D.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERNU.L and AT1D.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer