PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERND.L vs. ERNU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERND.L vs. ERNU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ERND.L) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ERND.L is traded in USD, while ERNU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ERNU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERND.L achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than ERNU.L's 2.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ERND.L having a 2.77% annualized return and ERNU.L not far ahead at 2.80%.


ERND.L

1D
0.05%
1M
0.27%
6M
1.87%
YTD
2.05%
1Y
4.24%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
2.77%

ERNU.L

1D
0.06%
1M
1.20%
6M
1.98%
YTD
2.16%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
5.21%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*
2.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERND.L vs. ERNU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERND.L
iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.05%4.84%5.55%5.09%2.03%0.00%1.21%3.03%2.11%1.48%
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
2.16%4.92%5.60%4.92%1.31%0.61%0.84%3.84%1.87%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ERND.L and ERNU.L is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2013

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERND.L vs. ERNU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERND.L
ERND.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ERND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ERND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

ERNU.L
ERNU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERNU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERND.L vs. ERNU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ERND.L) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ERND.LERNU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+7.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.37

1.17

+1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

21.13

3.16

+17.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

103.65

13.09

+90.57

ERND.L vs. ERNU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERND.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.34, which is higher than the ERNU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERND.L and ERNU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERND.L vs. ERNU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERND.L drawdown since its inception was -7.48%, smaller than the maximum ERNU.L drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERND.L and ERNU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERND.LERNU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-37.72%

+30.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.20%

-1.33%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.64%

-1.33%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.06%

-2.54%

+1.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.48%

-8.12%

+0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-16.51%

+16.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-31.12%

+31.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

0.32%

-0.28%

Volatility

ERND.L vs. ERNU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ERND.L) is 0.21%, while iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) has a volatility of 1.05%. This indicates that ERND.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERNU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERND.LERNU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

1.05%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.66%

3.83%

-3.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79%

4.39%

-3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.26%

4.80%

-3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.08%

5.09%

-3.01%

ERND.L vs. ERNU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ERND.L and ERNU.L have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ERND.L vs. ERNU.L - Dividend Comparison

ERND.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, which matches ERNU.L's 4.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERND.L
iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.31%4.70%5.54%5.00%1.57%0.49%1.55%2.71%2.19%1.39%0.99%0.72%
ERNU.L
iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
4.33%4.68%5.46%4.99%1.56%0.48%1.65%2.77%2.17%1.43%0.93%0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERND.L and ERNU.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERND.L and ERNU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

ERND.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while ERNU.L is Corporate Bonds. ERND.L tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index (USD), while ERNU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERND.L and ERNU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer