PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERND.L vs. 0FLE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERND.L vs. 0FLE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ERND.L) and iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (0FLE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ERND.L is traded in USD, while 0FLE.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the 0FLE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERND.L achieves a 2.00% return, which is significantly higher than 0FLE.L's -0.70% return.


ERND.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.30%
6M
1.83%
YTD
2.00%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
3.83%
10Y*
2.76%

0FLE.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.54%
6M
-0.08%
YTD
-0.70%
1Y
1.70%
3Y*
4.50%
5Y*
1.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERND.L vs. 0FLE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERND.L
iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.00%4.84%5.55%5.09%2.03%0.00%1.21%3.03%2.11%0.54%
0FLE.L
iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
-0.70%16.48%-1.60%7.49%-6.47%-7.28%6.92%0.79%-6.24%1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between ERND.L and 0FLE.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2017

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERND.L vs. 0FLE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERND.L
ERND.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ERND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
ERND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

0FLE.L
0FLE.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
0FLE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
0FLE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
0FLE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
0FLE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
0FLE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERND.L vs. 0FLE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ERND.L) and iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (0FLE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ERND.L0FLE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+8.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.31

1.04

+1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

20.61

0.27

+20.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

101.10

0.60

+100.50

ERND.L vs. 0FLE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERND.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.19, which is higher than the 0FLE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERND.L and 0FLE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ERND.L vs. 0FLE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERND.L drawdown since its inception was -7.48%, smaller than the maximum 0FLE.L drawdown of -24.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERND.L and 0FLE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERND.L0FLE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-24.67%

+17.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.20%

-5.06%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.64%

-7.39%

+6.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.06%

-20.07%

+19.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-3.36%

+3.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-8.64%

+8.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.04%

2.26%

-2.22%

Volatility

ERND.L vs. 0FLE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (ERND.L) is 0.21%, while iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (0FLE.L) has a volatility of 2.27%. This indicates that ERND.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 0FLE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERND.L0FLE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

2.27%

-2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.66%

5.10%

-4.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79%

6.77%

-5.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.26%

8.55%

-7.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.08%

7.89%

-5.81%

ERND.L vs. 0FLE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERND.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than 0FLE.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ERND.L vs. 0FLE.L - Dividend Comparison

ERND.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, less than 0FLE.L's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
0FLE.L
iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
4.69%5.04%6.01%5.52%1.49%0.58%1.60%2.96%2.07%0.36%0.00%0.00%
ERND.L
iShares $ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.31%4.70%5.54%5.00%1.57%0.49%1.55%2.71%2.19%1.39%0.99%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERND.L and 0FLE.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERND.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERND.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for 0FLE.L.

ERND.L tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index (USD), while 0FLE.L tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Note<5 Years Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ERND.L and 0.12% for 0FLE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERND.L and 0FLE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer