ERNA.L vs. ISAC.L
ERNA.L (iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ISAC.L (iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - ERNA.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while ISAC.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ERNA.L returned 3.77%/yr vs 11.38%/yr for ISAC.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ERNA.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ISAC.L.
Performance
ERNA.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERNA.L achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 11.54% return.
ERNA.L
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 4.36%
- 3Y*
- 5.21%
- 5Y*
- 3.77%
- 10Y*
- —
ISAC.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- YTD
- 11.54%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 28.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.38%
- 10Y*
- 12.63%
ERNA.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERNA.L iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.64% | 4.75% | 5.66% | 5.50% | 1.46% | 0.11% | 1.27% | 3.19% | 1.09% |
ISAC.L iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.54% | 22.36% | 17.81% | 22.57% | -18.16% | 18.85% | 15.66% | 25.77% | -8.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERNA.L and ISAC.L is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 4, 2018 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERNA.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank
ERNA.L
ISAC.L
ERNA.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ERNA.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.31 | 1.43 | +0.88 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 21.10 | 3.27 | +17.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 82.85 | 13.72 | +69.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ERNA.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.65 | 2.31 | +2.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 4.03 | 0.73 | +3.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 0.75 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
ERNA.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERNA.L drawdown since its inception was -8.63%, smaller than the maximum ISAC.L drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERNA.L and ISAC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERNA.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.63% | -33.82% | +25.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.20% | -8.77% | +8.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.38% | -16.56% | +16.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.81% | -26.07% | +25.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.72% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -4.69% | +4.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 2.10% | -2.05% |
Volatility
ERNA.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ERNA.L) is 0.30%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that ERNA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERNA.L | ISAC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.30% | 3.84% | -3.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.86% | 9.77% | -8.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93% | 12.40% | -11.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.93% | 15.57% | -14.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.17% | 15.95% | -13.78% |
ERNA.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ERNA.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ISAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ERNA.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ERNA.L nor ISAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ERNA.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ERNA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ERNA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ISAC.L.
ERNA.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ISAC.L is Global Equities. ERNA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while ISAC.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ERNA.L and 0.20% for ISAC.L.
Find the right allocation for ERNA.L and ISAC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer