PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ERN1.L vs. THNQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ERN1.L vs. THNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERN1.L) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ERN1.L is traded in GBP, while THNQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the THNQ values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ERN1.L achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than THNQ's 43.26% return.


ERN1.L

1D
0.17%
1M
0.50%
YTD
-0.66%
6M
-1.68%
1Y
1.60%
3Y*
20.59%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*
7.14%

THNQ

1D
-0.95%
1M
20.21%
YTD
43.26%
6M
38.30%
1Y
77.90%
3Y*
33.89%
5Y*
18.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ERN1.L vs. THNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ERN1.L
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
-0.66%5.12%-4.27%72.37%5.26%-6.83%3.45%
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
43.26%20.58%20.89%48.97%-32.69%10.13%43.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ERN1.L and THNQ is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020

0.02

The correlation between ERN1.L and THNQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ERN1.L vs. THNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ERN1.L
ERN1.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ERN1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERN1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERN1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
ERN1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERN1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

THNQ
THNQ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
THNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
THNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
THNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
THNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ERN1.L vs. THNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERN1.L) and ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ERN1.LTHNQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.47

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

4.17

-3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.92

11.71

-10.79

ERN1.L vs. THNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ERN1.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the THNQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ERN1.L and THNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ERN1.LTHNQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

3.08

-2.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.70

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.81

-0.41

Drawdowns

ERN1.L vs. THNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ERN1.L drawdown since its inception was -11.79%, smaller than the maximum THNQ drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERN1.L and THNQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ERN1.LTHNQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.79%

-42.37%

+30.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

-18.76%

+15.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.78%

-31.37%

+24.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.78%

-42.37%

+35.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-2.79%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-13.10%

+8.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

6.68%

-4.94%

Volatility

ERN1.L vs. THNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERN1.L) is 1.20%, while ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF (THNQ) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that ERN1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ERN1.LTHNQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

8.13%

-6.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

19.42%

-16.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.35%

25.41%

-21.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.29%

27.36%

+5.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.27%

27.02%

-2.75%

ERN1.L vs. THNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ERN1.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than THNQ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

ERN1.L vs. THNQ - Dividend Comparison

ERN1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while THNQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ERN1.L
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%41.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.00%13.08%
THNQ
ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.14%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ERN1.L and THNQ have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ERN1.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ERN1.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for THNQ.

ERN1.L is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while THNQ is Technology Equities. ERN1.L tracks Markit iBoxx EUR Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index, while THNQ tracks ROBO Global Artificial Intelligence Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for ERN1.L and 0.68% for THNQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ERN1.L and THNQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer